Hmmmmmm. I've only just seen the training bulletin - I misunderstood your PM, knotical!! I thought this was from the article that John et al wrote!
I have to admit a suspicion that this is based on my course. The timing is impecable - the course gets exposure in an UJ article, and suddenly PADI see it as a good idea. The wording appears different, though.... in my outline I never wrote anything that implied "to support experienced divers when diving without a partner" which clearly implies solo diving. My outline was focus on having the skills and knowledge to cope when circumstances left you alone.
I've asked PADI for an advance copy of this outline, which I'm sure that they will willingly give. After all, I can teach this course already so why not give me an outline? They've already released it to another instructor despite promising me that they wouldn't so it's already in the public domain, I suspect this might make it go viral.
I'll be fairly disappointed if this is based on my outline and they don't at least give some credit....
The crazy thing is that I don't really want to teach this course anymore. The last couple of times I taught it, I came pretty close (even for me) to breaking standards. I don't mind bending a few here and there from the standardised outline - but breaking standards that you wrote yourself is perhaps the ultimate faux pas!!?
I know teach the SDI Solo Diver course as the standards are a lot more flexible and allow me to teach a range of extra skills in different ways to suit different students and their aspirations.
What scares me the most is thinking that my PADI course will be turned into something it was never intended to be. It was designed so that students never touched the bottom and that they had to work in order to gain the certification. I suspect that we'll see a wrath of kneeling students come out with no skills and a card. Shame.
I have to admit a suspicion that this is based on my course. The timing is impecable - the course gets exposure in an UJ article, and suddenly PADI see it as a good idea. The wording appears different, though.... in my outline I never wrote anything that implied "to support experienced divers when diving without a partner" which clearly implies solo diving. My outline was focus on having the skills and knowledge to cope when circumstances left you alone.
I've asked PADI for an advance copy of this outline, which I'm sure that they will willingly give. After all, I can teach this course already so why not give me an outline? They've already released it to another instructor despite promising me that they wouldn't so it's already in the public domain, I suspect this might make it go viral.
I'll be fairly disappointed if this is based on my outline and they don't at least give some credit....
The crazy thing is that I don't really want to teach this course anymore. The last couple of times I taught it, I came pretty close (even for me) to breaking standards. I don't mind bending a few here and there from the standardised outline - but breaking standards that you wrote yourself is perhaps the ultimate faux pas!!?
I know teach the SDI Solo Diver course as the standards are a lot more flexible and allow me to teach a range of extra skills in different ways to suit different students and their aspirations.
What scares me the most is thinking that my PADI course will be turned into something it was never intended to be. It was designed so that students never touched the bottom and that they had to work in order to gain the certification. I suspect that we'll see a wrath of kneeling students come out with no skills and a card. Shame.