gj62:That's what the agencies are training - tourist divers - not technical divers, not advanced S&R divers, but tourists that want to experience the underwater realm. I see nothing wrong with that. For those that want more, other agencies have begun to fill that niche (GUE, for example).
I am of the beliefe that a tourist at 60 ft needs the same skills as any one else at 60 ft. This is where I totally part company with the entire recreational diving industry and totally agree with GUE.
If you don't want to, you shouldn't. You may be the best diver ever, and once maybe you were a darn fine instructor, but if your heart isn't in it, at some point your head won't be either, and that's not fair to your students. (You still may be "better" than some, but as I said before, there is no "instructor skill check" done by the agencies, which I think is a shame).
Well, I certainly wouldn't claim to be the best diver or instructor but I'm learning. I still enjoy teaching but not as the recreational diving industry has defined it. The students who are looking to go down that path are better off with some one else for an instructor and that's what I tell them.
I don't teach PADI classes at all anymore. I'm still active with IANTD and while they aren't perfect it's required that basic skills be assessed on each dive and that the instructor be in the water to do it. And yes the skill rating may be somewhat subjective but it at least makes it clear that solid skills are a requirement of every dive. The way I handle it is to have the student fill out the skill sheet themselves and then we compare notes. When we both agree that things are up to snuff then we're done.