sbijou
Contributor
If my memory is correct, the US Navy used a Scubapro Pilot down to 1800 fsw.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
gj62:I wouldn't say he's an idiot - I don't think he could be and come through such an event unscathed.
LUBOLD8431:The previous record was held by John Bennett who was using Apeks regs. As mentioned before, the record was broken by about 15 ft, and any high performance reg could have been used for this dive.
All that being said, there are many reasons why I would never own a Mares piece 'uh reg....
Greg, good posts. (Of course, I'm known to favour Ducatis, too.) :sappy:Greg Barlow:To each his own (reg choice)....
Greg Barlow:To each his own (reg choice)....After 28 years of VERY active diving, I've come to highly respect their excellent performance with such a simple, robust design. I asked sometime back for anyone to give me objective data to "prove" that Mares regs are "junk". Sure, I heard a lot of subjective negative reports, but not one OBJECTIVE case. Perhaps you can enlighten me with yours?
I also have many years of having worked in the industry under a number of different positions, and learned from the true professionals that ALL MAJOR MANUFACTURERS PRODUCE HIGH QUALITY REGULATORS.
I've stated before, and I'll say it again...If I didn't have such great luck with Mares regs, then I would probably opt for the Apeks models. I've used ScubaPro regs in the past (amongst many others), but am somewhat disillusioned with the large number of problems that have materialized over the past ten years. I don't mean to bash them, but some of the changes have been poor in my opinion. They are regularly modifying their HP seats, and pistons to correct the IP creeping that is too common. They switched to a polymer based second stage tube, even though the brass one offered many advantages (except ease of manufacturing and costs). Plus, their second stages have been materializing with design flaws that have required some significant changes. Perhaps doing a little more R&D along the road would eliminate some of these production problems. The ultimate disaster has been the aluminum alloy first stage. The first run design of these were having major electrolysis problems and they had such a run of yokes literally cracking in half that many shops refused to place them on the store's shelves.
Even the most ardent ScubaPro fans in the industry are discussing these very same points. If ScubaPro isn't careful, then some of their most loyal customers could be swayed to other brands.
Mares, like all of the other manufacturers, has their problems too. The HUB is a joke, and the pneumatic cam tank band was another solution to a non-existant problem. I also don't care for most of their BCD's.
All, Apeks....They make wonderful regulators, and very good dry suit valves. However, their other gear certainly doesn't fit the "high performance" label. I don't even recall them attempting to import much of anything other than the regs. I remember before the AT series came out, that their regs were considered to be "sub par" compared to the other major lines.
So...Slamming Mares regs without some scientific data is akin to labeling all motorcycles other than Harley Davidsons as junk. Being a life long motorcyclist I love to converse with Harely riders as to why Harleys are "better, more technologically advanced" machines than the competition. The vaulted V-Rod is a prime example...Harley riders love to talk about how advanced it is. Right, the Japanese and Italians have been building engines with that level of technology since the early 80's. Well, actually, they've been building racing bikes with that technology since the early 60's.
Mares regs are one of the highest performing non-adjustable regs on the market. Their level of machining and finishing is amongst the best. They DO NOT have the lowest work-of-breathing effort due to the fact that you cannot adjust the cracking pressure to the point of just below a free-flow. Take a non-adjustable Apeks or ScubaPro design and run them on the ANSTI machine. The numbers are nearly identical to that of the best Mares models. I've worked with the computer printouts of these specific tests, how about you?
Apeks, ScubaPro, Oceanic, Mares, Poseidon, etc. They all make regs that can meet or exceed the needs of 90% of the world's divers and dives. Care for them properly, have skilled technicians service them, and you can rest assured that problems will be few and far between.
Once again...Do you really believe that considering Mares is one of the top three selling brands worldwide they are not going to not build a high quality regulator? They have had one recall on a reg in three years, and that was a newly designed crown on the Axis's second stage. They replaced them totally free of charge along with a total second stage rebuild regardless of whether it had proof of warranty.
Let me guess, Lubold, I bet that you only drive the "best" car or truck that is made. You probably also drink the best beverage that money can buy, and heck, maybe even ride a Harley.
It is kinda neat when a Harley with a 1,450 ci engine gets totally dusted by a Ducati 620 Monster. Unfair! They cry! Really, uhm...The Ducati has an air cooled V-Twin engine with but two valves per cylinder (kinda like a Harley). Throw a little Suzuki SV650 into the picture, and the Harley and Ducati are looking for a hiding spot.
Sorry to get so off track, but the analogy of regs and bikes isn't that far off in logic.
Oh, well...
Greg Barlow
Former Science Editior of Rodale's Scuba Diving Magazine
Presently working in a better paying position to send the kids through school
Most importantly, never in any way shape or form, a Mares employee.....
100% certified Dive Nut for 28 years