I don't have a dog in this fight. I don't care if the thanks count comes back or stays away. I never paid it much attention anyway. I don't think a high thanks count gives anyone credibility. Others do. They have a right to use whatever means they please to make those value judgments.
I do think the reasons given are contrived. I've never seen the thanks count cause any problems and I've certainly never seen it destroy a thread. I have seen a few folks thank others for useless posts, but who cares? These are the same people who try to set records with the number of "friends" they have on ScubaBoard. Will the friends feature be disabled next?
I'm open minded enough to believe it when I'm told, "it caused a lot of problems that weren't obvious from the outside looking in." If that's true, tell us the problems. I'm not asking anyone to reveal what someone else said in the back room, just explain the problems.
I'm cynical enough to wonder what's being hidden when I hear, "I can only ask that you trust me when I say..." Seems fishy to me, although I do trust the person who said it, I don't trust that type of statement from anyone.
Pete owns this board and can make just about any decision he wants about just about anything concerning it. He has no obligation to explain his reasons. On the other hand, he usually does not take that approach. He tries to be open about his decisions. He tries to get feedback from members. He tries to make us feel like this board belongs to the members as much as to him. If he wants to continue along those lines, explaining these types of decisions would be helpful.
I do think the reasons given are contrived. I've never seen the thanks count cause any problems and I've certainly never seen it destroy a thread. I have seen a few folks thank others for useless posts, but who cares? These are the same people who try to set records with the number of "friends" they have on ScubaBoard. Will the friends feature be disabled next?
I'm open minded enough to believe it when I'm told, "it caused a lot of problems that weren't obvious from the outside looking in." If that's true, tell us the problems. I'm not asking anyone to reveal what someone else said in the back room, just explain the problems.
I'm cynical enough to wonder what's being hidden when I hear, "I can only ask that you trust me when I say..." Seems fishy to me, although I do trust the person who said it, I don't trust that type of statement from anyone.
Christi:don't understand why some members feel that they (staff members) should be obligated to explain in detail exactly what all of the issues were or why they came to the decisions they did.
Pete owns this board and can make just about any decision he wants about just about anything concerning it. He has no obligation to explain his reasons. On the other hand, he usually does not take that approach. He tries to be open about his decisions. He tries to get feedback from members. He tries to make us feel like this board belongs to the members as much as to him. If he wants to continue along those lines, explaining these types of decisions would be helpful.