Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Interesting that they’ve opted for an old-school fixed layout monochrome LCD 7 segment number display rather than a dot matrix TFT or OLED screen — although the middle row is dot matrix with no smoothing. Means that the screen layout is fixed in hardware and can’t change layout for other diving modes.AFAIK, $20 - 30 less than the Peregrine for the non-AI version. About $50 more for the AI version.
That's a tiny battery, which (together with price) probably explains the screen. They certainly were aiming for thin and willing to compromise to achieve it, it seems.CR2450 battery is user-changeable and rated for up to two years/300 dives.
{edit - @jborg above was typing faster than me -}
- CR2450 battery is user-changeable and rated for up to two years/300 dives.
depends if you prefer AI or not I would guess for typical rec diving.Seems only superficially like a Periguine.
Would expect the price to drop a fair amount.
(TLA = Three Letter Acronym)
Interesting that they’ve opted for an old-school fixed layout monochrome LCD 7 segment number display rather than a dot matrix TFT or OLED screen — although the middle row is dot matrix with no smoothing. Means that the screen layout is fixed in hardware and can’t change layout for other diving modes.
The user interface appears quite cluttered with uncommon TLAs (MBL0, NST, two unlabelled numbers and an orphaned coloured bar)
"its seems"That's a tiny battery, which (together with price) probably explains the screen. They certainly were aiming for thin and willing to compromise to achieve it, it seems.
The specs contradict what you said, read below please.
"its seems"
Read the specs that seem to contradict what you said, read below please.
A PDF of the comparison is provided also below as an attachment:
View attachment 746706