It is in my opinion not a system for small passages but rather for a big gas load.
What does a "gas load" have to do with any of this?
Sidemount is designed for small (low) passage, areas that do not cater to a backmount configuration.
So if your point is that the sandwiched BP solution is ok for OW and BM caves but not for sidemount cave, I agree.
And since pretty much all of the caves I have been to contain some sidemount passages, that makes a sandwiched BP about as useful as BM.
As I said, that really seems to be your problem nakatomi.
The rigid backplate is fine, if you do not want to bent your back too much and make sure it cannot get stuck anywhere - by not going into that extrem restrictions for example.
And of course the handling of any diving rig is identical everywhere, not only ow and overhead.
Just close your eyes ones and tell me if you are in a cave or outside with a thick hood or wearing a helmet and while you are at it also tell me your depth.
That's what I do not like about some of those discussions: more distractions than substance.
Are you serious? I'm not even going to reply to that since you are making assumptions as usual, about something (overhead environment diving) you have little to no experience with.
Do you remember when you posted that open water diving was way more dangerous than cave diving? Because, so you said, in OW if the compass fails, one could be forced to surface in a shipping lane and get run over by a freighter.
In cave diving on the other hand (again your words), nothing can happen as there are lines everywhere making it pretty much bulletproof and very safe.
Please spare us your wisdom when it comes to cave diving...