Missdirected:
Sorry fella's I seriously disagree with you on underwear choices. Just as women have moved from having pads essentially tied to us (giant, bulky, uncomfortable things) to most using tampons. We have moved from wads of underwear material hanging from us. Sorry, I don't see underwear as sexual. Unless I am buying the things from a sex shop!
Yes, I didn't mean to start any trouble here, but women have put up with quite a bit, historically. Okay..let me not compare thong underwear to jock straps...how bout a boy in a speedo?
I don't really make fun of men in speedos because I know they are very practical. People make fun, but they don't imply the men are promiscuous if they wear them, the way they do if a woman wears certain things.
My point is, people will more quickly "assume things" about a girl who wears certain things than a guy. And..we females have to be a little radical and defend ourselves, or who knows what pious individuals would have us wearing. We need to do it for our daughters, so they will have the freedom to dress how they like.
If a parent finds them distasteful, for their daughter...that's fine, but they should stop short of assuming a girl who wears something is promiscous, because quite often, that is not true. At least don't project your ideas and perceptions on to child you don't know.
When I was in high school, many of the parents made a thing about girls that used tampons, and made inferences from that...very damaging and ignorant.
It's a good comparison Miss makes because now at least girls can take gym class and participate in all sports. If certain girls did not fly in the face of "conventional wisdom" we would all still be stuck on that shore.
I don't believe the issue here is makeup or not, the issue is a teacher overstepping her authority.....
I actually agree with that...hopefully she has the rapport with someone who is trusted with her very young child, to say "could you not let her do that again?"