What makes the HP Steel 80 awful? I understand that it changes your trim being a diff physical size, but is it that hard to adjust it's location on your back? I'm considering one for the weight advantage in cold water dry suit diving. Thanks!
There are pros and cons with all things. I love my HP 80's (PST, 3,500 psig Sherwood Genesis cylinders) for certain types of diving. I purchased my pair new in 1988, not long after they first became available. I special-ordered mine, the first sold in this area (central MO) so far as I'm aware. I dove/dive mine as singles with my 1987-era Scubapro Stab Jacket and the 1994-era SSJ that replaced it. This configuration works best (for me) with a two-piece (farmer John), medium thickness wetsuit when diving MO and AR freshwater lakes (55 degree F water temps at depth). And I did dive this configuration briefly, for northern OH and early Great Lakes recreational drysuit diving before I purchased HP 100's.
The HP 80 is a bit too negatively buoyant (for me) when diving a thin (3mm) wetsuit in fresh water. And, being such a short (~20") cylinder, it makes reaching back to the cylinder valve a bit challenging--but my SSJ mounts a cylinder quite low, so the HP 80 fits perfectly for use with a SSJ.
Plenty of gas (82 cu ft @ 3,500 psig) for a recreational dive. And small enough to carry a pair easily in a Fiat Sypder 2000 (which I was driving when I purchased them) and in a 1993 RX-7, too.
Not suitable (for me), though, to dive with my BP/W or SS Freedom Plate configurations. I prefer a taller cylinder (~25") for this.
I am 6'2".
Note: I did find that my HP 100's (PST, 102 cu ft @ 3,500 psig Sherwood Genesis cylinders, 24# length, 7.25" O.D.) are a better cylinder (for me) as singles when doing recreational drysuit diving in the Great Lakes.
rx7diver