With no exceptions, all the divers I know who did GUE courses become better divers because of it. These are top notch people, I would never hesitate to dive with a diver who took GUE courses.
However, I can also say that about divers who take upper level TDI, NAUI, PADI, SSI, or whatever courses from top notch and very disciplined instructors, who teach almost all of the same theory and techniques, because--[wait for it]--GUE didn't actually invent any of that!
...
The claim that no other agency has rigorous standards is false. They do emphasize quality control though.
A friend of mine took GUE Tech 1 last year even though he had a similar certification from another agency. He said that in his mind neither he nor the other students should have passed the class, but they did. The instructor was unable to hold a stop. They did 0 ascents in blue water. And the instructor also popped to the surface while demonstrating an S-drill. He signed up for Tech 1 because he didn't feel comfortable doing the dives he was certified for. Do I think this would be the case with all instructors/classes from that agency? Not at all. Would I be surprised to hear a similar story from a GUE class? Very! Do I think this is related to standards, enforcement of them and quality control? Absolutely!
It's hard to become a GUE instructor, and they are required to dive actively and recertify regularly. Of course there are great instructors from other agencies, but I don't understand why so many are OK with the lack of quality control in other agencies.
So that's how you can tend to see "GUE Diver" as much as you see "diver who took GUE courses which were great." It seems cliquey by design. Which is good for that all-important (but also confining?) "standardization," and also apparently for business retention.
Some might find it confining. I find it liberating! Standardization of protocols and equipment makes diving easy, effortless and fun for me. It gives me freedom to enjoy my dives, always knowing where my team mates are, never having to turn around to look for them or chase them. Never having to be worried that they are pushing their own limits, exceeding the gas plan, or pushing me to exceed my own limits. Easy planning and adaptation of the plan if needed. Easy sharing of team resources, spare parts etc.
From an instructor, guide or "team" standpoint, yes it seems like it would be great that your students actually admit and accept they haven't mastered things, actually have the time (and money) to get it right, and all follow almost exactly the same *everything* according to exactly what GUE prescribes for them to do, buy, think, etc.
In my ongoing GUE class we all have different brands of wings, backplates, harnesses, drysuits, undergarments, lights. We happen to all have Apeks regs (popular here), and the same cheap Beaver masks, while the instructor has Halcyon regs. We're also asked to *gasp* think for ourselves, and also to give constructive feedback to each other and the instructor.
PS.
Remember the friend I mentioned earlier. In his GUE class he wasn't asked to buy anything, but the other agency pushed him to buy a second computer from their shop for the class. So the whole thing cost him more in the end, and he wasn't even comfortable using the cert...