K_girl
Contributor
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)
February 22, 2006 Wednesday
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A-01
LENGTH: 866 words
HEADLINE: Swain could take witness stand today
BYLINE: TOM MOONEY, Journal Staff Writer
The Jamestown man who faces a wrongful-death lawsuit over the drowning of his wife has mounted no defense.
PROVIDENCE - David Swain is scheduled to take the witness stand this morning in front of a jury which, for seven days, has heard mounting testimony alleging that he killed his wife, Shelley Tyre, seven years ago during a scuba-diving vacation.
Swain, 50, of Jamestown, appeared in the courtroom -- but outside the view of the jury -- for the first time yesterday since his wrongful-death civil trial began. Dressed in a blue blazer and a tie-less dress shirt, he sat alone at the defense table, hands clasped, as Superior Court Judge Patricia A. Hurst ruled against his motions to dismiss the case and to quash his subpoena to testify.
Swain had argued in court papers that the suit -- brought by Shelley Tyre's parents, Richard and Lisa Tyre of Jamestown -- should be dismissed because his wife's death in 1999 had happened outside Rhode Island jurisdiction, in Tortola in the British Virgin Islands.
But Hurst said the court "absolutely" has jurisdiction in such civil cases where monetary damages are possible, regardless of where "the alleged criminal conduct" occurred.
Swain has never been charged criminally with the death of his wife. Tortola police ruled her death an accident "unless proven otherwise." Swain has countersued Richard Tyre for defamation.
Swain had chosen to offer no defense in the case -- at least not one before the eight-member jury. And it was his absence during the last seven days to which Hurst alluded in denying his motion to quash his subpoena.
Swain argued that since the Tyre's lawyer, J. Renn Olenn, has presented the jury with some three hours of videotape of him answering questions at depositions, his presence on the witness stand wasn't necessary.
Hurst said she had weighed Swain's motion carefully, but finally concluded that Swain had waived his objection by not raising issue with the videotapes when they were shown and that there was still relevent information Olenn could inquire about with Swain on the stand.
Hurst warned Olenn, however, that although she was allowing him to call Swain to the stand, she wouldn't allow him to turn the occasion into a "dog-and-pony show" where Swain is forced to respond to a litany of accusatory questions by repeatedly invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Swain is expected to be the last witness Olenn calls in the case. Hurst told the jury she will likely give them her deliberation instructions this afternoon.
Swain's late-afternoon court appearance ended a day in which the jury heard Olenn in a videotaped deposition try to show discrepancies in statements Swain had given about the diving incident.
In the 2003 deposition played to the jury Monday, Swain said he and Shelley Tyre dove together to a pair of wrecked tugboats and that the two then separated -- as they often did -- with Swain eventually swimming off into shallower water to investigate a nearby reef.
At some point while swimming toward the reef, Swain said he looked back and saw his wife by one of the wrecks. He said it was the last time he saw her alive.
In the deposition the jury watched yesterday, Olenn is heard asking Swain several times to explain the statements he gave to the Tortola police three hours after a diving friend of Swain's had pulled Tyre's body up from 80 feet of water.
In that written statement, Olenn said, Swain indicated it was Tyre who swam off and left him by the wrecks and that Swain, when he could not find her, went looking for her.
Reading from the statement -- which Swain initialed by page and signed at the bottom as accurate -- Olenn said: " 'After I looked around for a few minutes I decided to go to shallow water to try to locate her.' "
Which was the right version of events? Olenn asked Swain. The one he gave that day or the one he was giving now, four years later.
Replied Swain: "I don't know why I told the police I was going off to locate her."
Olenn had to understand his mental condition at the time, said Swain: "I was stressed. I was at my wits' end. I don't know what I did."
Olenn then read another part of Swain's police statement, in which Swain told the investigating officer that normally he and Tyre signaled to each other if they were going off alone or surfacing.
"Why didn't you do it this time?" Olenn asked.
"I have no answer for that," said Swain.
Another witness yesterday was Allan M. Feldman, a Brown University professor of economics, who testified that the net economic loss of Shelley Tyre's death, when factoring in her future earnings, amounted to $854,364. The jury might consider that figure if the trial reaches a point where it is deliberating damage awards. Swain, however, filed for bankruptcy last fall.
February 22, 2006 Wednesday
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A-01
LENGTH: 866 words
HEADLINE: Swain could take witness stand today
BYLINE: TOM MOONEY, Journal Staff Writer
The Jamestown man who faces a wrongful-death lawsuit over the drowning of his wife has mounted no defense.
PROVIDENCE - David Swain is scheduled to take the witness stand this morning in front of a jury which, for seven days, has heard mounting testimony alleging that he killed his wife, Shelley Tyre, seven years ago during a scuba-diving vacation.
Swain, 50, of Jamestown, appeared in the courtroom -- but outside the view of the jury -- for the first time yesterday since his wrongful-death civil trial began. Dressed in a blue blazer and a tie-less dress shirt, he sat alone at the defense table, hands clasped, as Superior Court Judge Patricia A. Hurst ruled against his motions to dismiss the case and to quash his subpoena to testify.
Swain had argued in court papers that the suit -- brought by Shelley Tyre's parents, Richard and Lisa Tyre of Jamestown -- should be dismissed because his wife's death in 1999 had happened outside Rhode Island jurisdiction, in Tortola in the British Virgin Islands.
But Hurst said the court "absolutely" has jurisdiction in such civil cases where monetary damages are possible, regardless of where "the alleged criminal conduct" occurred.
Swain has never been charged criminally with the death of his wife. Tortola police ruled her death an accident "unless proven otherwise." Swain has countersued Richard Tyre for defamation.
Swain had chosen to offer no defense in the case -- at least not one before the eight-member jury. And it was his absence during the last seven days to which Hurst alluded in denying his motion to quash his subpoena.
Swain argued that since the Tyre's lawyer, J. Renn Olenn, has presented the jury with some three hours of videotape of him answering questions at depositions, his presence on the witness stand wasn't necessary.
Hurst said she had weighed Swain's motion carefully, but finally concluded that Swain had waived his objection by not raising issue with the videotapes when they were shown and that there was still relevent information Olenn could inquire about with Swain on the stand.
Hurst warned Olenn, however, that although she was allowing him to call Swain to the stand, she wouldn't allow him to turn the occasion into a "dog-and-pony show" where Swain is forced to respond to a litany of accusatory questions by repeatedly invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Swain is expected to be the last witness Olenn calls in the case. Hurst told the jury she will likely give them her deliberation instructions this afternoon.
Swain's late-afternoon court appearance ended a day in which the jury heard Olenn in a videotaped deposition try to show discrepancies in statements Swain had given about the diving incident.
In the 2003 deposition played to the jury Monday, Swain said he and Shelley Tyre dove together to a pair of wrecked tugboats and that the two then separated -- as they often did -- with Swain eventually swimming off into shallower water to investigate a nearby reef.
At some point while swimming toward the reef, Swain said he looked back and saw his wife by one of the wrecks. He said it was the last time he saw her alive.
In the deposition the jury watched yesterday, Olenn is heard asking Swain several times to explain the statements he gave to the Tortola police three hours after a diving friend of Swain's had pulled Tyre's body up from 80 feet of water.
In that written statement, Olenn said, Swain indicated it was Tyre who swam off and left him by the wrecks and that Swain, when he could not find her, went looking for her.
Reading from the statement -- which Swain initialed by page and signed at the bottom as accurate -- Olenn said: " 'After I looked around for a few minutes I decided to go to shallow water to try to locate her.' "
Which was the right version of events? Olenn asked Swain. The one he gave that day or the one he was giving now, four years later.
Replied Swain: "I don't know why I told the police I was going off to locate her."
Olenn had to understand his mental condition at the time, said Swain: "I was stressed. I was at my wits' end. I don't know what I did."
Olenn then read another part of Swain's police statement, in which Swain told the investigating officer that normally he and Tyre signaled to each other if they were going off alone or surfacing.
"Why didn't you do it this time?" Olenn asked.
"I have no answer for that," said Swain.
Another witness yesterday was Allan M. Feldman, a Brown University professor of economics, who testified that the net economic loss of Shelley Tyre's death, when factoring in her future earnings, amounted to $854,364. The jury might consider that figure if the trial reaches a point where it is deliberating damage awards. Swain, however, filed for bankruptcy last fall.