Swain Case Reference Materials - No Comments

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Visual representation of distances captured from NBC Dateline story.

Mooring to wreck. Shelly was found between the two wrecks on the far left.

Mooring%20to%20Wreck.jpg


Mooring%20to%20Wreck%201.jpg


Mooring%20to%20Wreck%203.jpg


Visual representation of distance from wreck to reef:

Wreck%20to%20Reef.jpg


Fin to the wreck:

Fin%20Re-enactment%202.jpg


Fin standing upright as Thwaites described:

Fin%20Re-enactment.jpg
 
December 14, 2009
SECTION: NEWS
LENGTH: 518 words
HEADLINE: Q&A with Timothy J. Bradl, Massachusetts attorney
BYLINE: David Frank

Age: 43, Graduated: Suffolk University Law School, 1992, Bar admission: 1992

Job: Attorney, Denner Pellegrino, Boston and Providence
Practice area: Criminal defense

In late October, a jury in the British Virgin Islands convicted Jamestown's David Swain of murder in connection with the 1999 drowning death of his wife during a scuba-diving trip in Tortola.

Three years earlier, a civil jury in Providence had found Swain, a former councilman and dive-shop operator, responsible for her drowning.

Despite the efforts of Boston lawyers Timothy J. Bradl and Neil S. Tassel, who assisted the BVI counsel in the criminal case, Swain was sentenced last month to 25 years in prison. Bradl discussed the trial with Lawyers Weekly's David Frank.

Q. What role did the judge allow you to play during the trial?

A. We were not allowed to address the court in the British system. We would have had to go to law school in the Caribbean for six months to get a certificate and simply could not do that.

Q. Were you surprised the judge didn't allow you to argue the case?

A. We were hopeful that we could address the court and the jury and examine witnesses, but in the end the system down there is such that it was not allowed. So our role was limited to providing support, retaining and preparing experts, strategizing with local counsel, and providing suggested lines of questioning and cross-examination areas and working on closing arguments.

Q. What are the biggest differences between the American and British legal systems?

A. Jury selection there lasted about 20 minutes. There is a nine-person jury. They can convict or acquit on a 7-2 vote. However, it's within the judge's discretion to accept or reject anything other than a unanimous verdict. Within the first two hours of deliberations, the jury cannot come back with a verdict unless they are unanimous.

Q. What was the most unusual aspect of the trial?

A. There is a local custom that we found, to say the least, extremely unsettling. After about four hours, the jury is expected to render a verdict regardless of where they are in their deliberations. [Court officials] literally knock on the door, and the jurors are expected to have a verdict. That was definitely difficult for us to deal with. The other thing was that the jury was allowed to deliberate as things unfolded in the trial. In addition, arguments that really should be done at sidebar, out of the hearing of the jury, unfolded in open court. They would literally argue about whether something should be admitted in front of the jury.

Q. How hard is it to sit by and watch that?

A. As an attorney from the U.S., it was very difficult to have to sit there and cede the actual lawyering to a local attorney, and it was very difficult to function in a system where we felt that the safeguards that you take for granted here are not present.

Q. Did Swain get a fair trial?

A. All I can say is that the fairness of this trial will be a central appellate issue, and the case will go to the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeals. From there, he has a subsequent right of appeal to Britain's version of the Supreme Court.
 
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)
April 9, 2008 Wednesday

HEADLINE: Swain's lawyer asks for dismissal
BYLINE: Tom Mooney, Journal Staff Writer

The lawyer for David Swain, being held in the Caribbean on a murder charge after being found responsible in Rhode Island for his wife's death, wants the state Supreme Court to throw out the conviction.

PROVIDENCE - While David Swain spent 23 hours of yesterday, like every day, locked in his Caribbean prison cell, his lawyer asked the state Supreme Court to throw out the civil suit conviction instrumental in the former Jamestown Town Council member now facing a murder charge.

The uncertain relevance of any immediate decision by a Rhode Island court while Swain remains incarcerated in a foreign country's prison wasn't lost on the five justices.

As Swain's lawyer, Anthony R. Leone, began to argue one point of Swain's appeal for a new trial - that the civil suit against Swain improperly omitted certain parties - Justice Maureen McKenna Goldberg interrupted:

"It seems to me this is the least of your client's problems, with all due respect Mr. Leone."

But prior to addressing the justices, Leone said that what was at stake "was a matter of justice. It's about having a fair civil trial and certainly anything positive to come out of this civil case could be beneficial in the criminal matter."

Two years ago, Swain, 52, went on trial in a civil case, charged with the wrongful death of his wife, Shelley Tyre. An experienced scuba diver, she drowned roughly eight minutes after entering the water with her husband on the last day of their vacation in Tortola in 1999. Tortola officials initially ruled her death an accident.

Tyre's parents filed the suit in an effort to prevent Swain from benefiting from their daughter's estate and to get answers about her death, which, they said, their former son-in-law could not, or would not, answer.

Swain, who maintains his innocence, chose not to have a lawyer present during the eight-day trial. For the first two days, Swain himself skipped the proceeding. Eventually he showed up to represent himself, but put on little defense.

Instead, he heard lawyer Renn Olenn, representing Tyre's parents, make one unchallenged allegation after another: that Swain, who because of a prenuptial agreement would receive nothing if the pair divorced, killed his wife for money to keep his beloved dive shop open, and at a time when he was romancing another woman.

The jury deliberated less than three hours before finding that Swain had killed his wife. The conviction forced Tortola officials to look again at the case, and, last November, federal marshals, armed with a murder warrant from Tortola, arrested Swain at his Jamestown scuba shop, Ocean State Scuba.

Chief Justice Frank J. Williams referred to Swain's unusual, if not ineffectual, legal strategy as he welcomed Leone to the lectern yesterday.

"Too bad you didn't get involved in the civil case," Williams said.

The chief justice said pro-se cases - cases in which someone represents themselves -"are the worst cases we get," often convoluted by defendants' unfamiliarity with courtroom rules.

"How are you going to sort it out," Williams asked Leone, "if we can't sort it out?"

Leone replied by outlining Swain's reasons for asking for a new trial.

Among the key points: that Superior Court Judge Patricia Hurst denied Swain's right to legal representation by refusing to delay the start of the civil trial after his lawyer fell ill with cancer.

Hurst also erred, Leone argued, by allowing the jury to convict Swain under the "slayer's statute," designed to prevent perpetrators from benefiting from someone's death. Leone said the question of what benefactors are disqualified under that statute should be determined by a probate court judge, not a Superior Court judge.

Further, Leone argued that Swain should receive a new trial because his two grown children from a previous marriage - listed in Shelley Tyre's will as secondary benefactors, after Swain - should have been made parties to the civil suit.

The justices appeared to have little patience for much of Leone's arguments - particularly Swain's assertion that Hurst denied him legal representation.

Noting the numerous continuances that Hurst afforded Swain - and Swain's own efforts to delay the civil trial - Williams said: "How many times does a trial justice have to put up with that? How many continuances were there in this case? ...You think a Superior Court judge really wants a trial to go forward with a pro-se client?"

If one does, Williams said, perhaps there ought to be "a competency hearing of the trial justice."

Goldberg, rubbing her forehead, added: "Your client danced across the bridge" to bankruptcy court, effectively bringing the civil trial to a dead stop, once his assets were protected. "He obviously had someone on the sidelines" coaching him, she said.

Leone's argument that Swain's children should have been listed in the Tyres' suit appeared to win some traction with the justices. But the relevance to the matter now again seemed questionable.

"I don't know how to unravel this mess," said Justice Francis X. Flaherty.

Leone had a suggestion: give Swain a new trial.

Even if the court was so inclined, how could it order a new trial, asked Williams. "He's not here. Your client is out of the country. How are we going to have a new trial?"

Said Leone: "Frankly, your honor, that is a question I can't answer."

In rebuttal, Olenn, the Tyres' lawyer, argued that Swain had surrendered his rights to a new trial by not raising his many objections at the time of trial.

The justices appeared in agreement on that point.

"If you don't do that, you have no … salvation," said Justice William P. Robinson III.

Referring to one of Flaherty's earlier remarks, Robinson said: "you can't hide in the weeds … and raise an objection after the fact."

The justices gave no indication when they might rule on Swain's appeal.

Meanwhile, the official inquest into Shelley Tyre's death is scheduled to begin next week in Tortola. The inquest is similar to a grand jury investigation.

If indicted, Swain could go on trial late this summer or early fall.
 
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)
March 24, 2006 Friday

HEADLINE: Judge rejects Swain's bid for new trial

BYLINE: W. ZACHARY MALINOWSKI, Journal Staff Writer

Superior Court Judge Patricia A. Hurst says the civil jury's finding that David Swain is liable for the drowning death of his wife was "the only reasonable conclusion a jury could draw."

PROVIDENCE - A Superior Court judge yesterday denied to grant a new trial to David Swain, a Jamestown scuba shop owner, who was accused of drowning his wife, Shelley Tyre, during a Caribbean diving vacation in 1999.

Last month, a jury issued a civil judgment of $6 million, concluding that there was overwhelming evidence that Swain killed Tyre. After almost two weeks of testimony, the jury had deliberated less than three hours to find Swain, a former member of the Jamestown Town Council, liable for Tyre's death. Nonetheless, Swain has never been criminally charged.

Yesterday, Judge Patricia A. Hurst, who presided over the civil trial, noted that there was a parade of expert witnesses that painted a clear and convincing case that Swain was responsible for taking Tyre's life.

"In short, the only reasonable conclusion a jury could draw . . . was that this was a homicide," Hurst said. "I'm satisfied that I would have reached the same verdict as the jury. The quality of the evidence was strong."

Before Hurst issued her ruling, Swain, who is not a lawyer, represented himself and gave a rambling 15-minute presentation on why he deserved a new trial. He raised 10 points, including one in which he accused the judge of denying his motion for a continuance after one of his lawyers fell ill with cancer. He also argued that the evidence used against him was "so circumstantial" and that much of it was based on "speculation and opinion."

J. Renn Olenn, who represented Shelley Tyre's parents, Richard and Lisa Tyre, in their wrongful-death lawsuit, pointed out that Shelley Tyre was an experienced diver in good physical shape. He said that evidence gathered from the dive site off Tortola showed that Swain fought with Tyre underwater.

"Broken scattered gear shows a struggle," Olenn said.

Hurst, citing the evidence presented at trial, said she was bothered by the fact that Swain showed little interest in how his wife drowned. She also noted that Swain's demeanor was "flat" and he had a hard time recalling details about the day of his wife's death -- March 12, 1999.

"These aren't the kind of events that people forget easily," she said. "How could a person not know, not want to understand?"

Hurst also alluded to a prenuptial agreement that Tyre and Swain signed about a year after their marriage in the early 1990s. According to the agreement, Swain would not be awarded a penny if the couple divorced.

She also cited evidence that Tyre was the breadwinner and financed Swain's scuba-diving business. The couple also had a rocky relationship, she said. Before issuing her ruling from the bench, Hurst also said that Swain spent about $500,000 in the years following his wife's death.

Swain's argument that he was not afforded a continuance after his lawyer, Paul Anderson, fell ill with cancer seemed to raise Hurst's ire. She noted that for more than three years she urged Swain to look for another lawyer, or a backup lawyer, in case his lawyer was too sick to try the case.

Swain never did. On Tuesday, Swain filed an appeal of the jury's civil judgment to the state Supreme Court. The high court has not set a date to hear the case.
 
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)

March 5, 2006 Sunday
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A-01
LENGTH: 2371 words

HEADLINE: Did he? Didn't he? How could they? A verdict ends the whispering

BYLINE: TOM MOONEY, Journal Staff Writer

For years, Richard Tyre says, people on Jamestown "believed we were just grief-stricken parents and probably irrational. They didn't believe he had done anything."

JAMESTOWN - A biting wind races across the Great Creek salt marsh, pressing down upon this island a sense of winter isolation, as David Swain stands just up the road in the vacant parking lot of his scuba shop, eager to tell his story.

It is four days since a jury in Providence concluded he killed his wife, Shelley Tyre, in 1999 on a scuba-diving vacation -- and four years since her parents, who live a few miles away, filed the wrongful death suit against him.

The verdict has returned this saga to the top of conversation at the Slice of Heaven coffee shop, where regulars gravitate each day. It is whispered conversation; in a town of 5,000 year-round residents, you never know when the person you're talking about will walk in.

Richard and Lisa Tyre will tell you of their "tortuous" island encounters at McQuade's grocery and the post office with David Swain, the man they're convinced drowned their daughter.

Throughout the years, however, David Swain and the Tyres shared one thing.

Each had become subjects of island speculation: Did he do it? Are the Tyres so desperate for answers they would accuse an innocent man?

Now with the civil trial over, Swain speaks of injustice, the Tyres of vindication.

"A GUILTY MAN would have run," says Swain.

Inside his shop, he takes a stool beside a space heater in a room cluttered with scuba tanks, air hoses and tools.

A defense lawyer might have offered up that argument for a jury's consideration, had Swain used a lawyer. Instead he represented himself and called just one witness, his 30-year-old daughter, to support his contention that he is a peaceful man.

Swain says he planned to use a lawyer until the lawyer was diagnosed with cancer in December.

Before that month was over, Swain says, he had "prepared my kids, my family and my friends that the verdict would be against me. It was inconceivable in the short amount of time left I could mount a defense equal to what the plaintiffs brought against me."

"The Tyres have spent, who knows how much money, and their law firm has been at this for six years, and with unlimited amounts of money and resources, they put together their highly speculative story."

The Tyres' lawyer, J. Renn Olenn, told jurors that Swain killed 46-year-old Shelley Tyre off the coast of Tortola for money, at a time when he was pursuing another woman. Olenn called among his two dozen witnesses the chief medical examiner of Florida's Miami-Dade County, an underwater forensic investigator, and a renowned scuba gear engineer. All supported Olenn's contention that Swain attacked Tyre from behind in about 80 feet of water, turned off her air supply, ripped off her facemask and held her down long enough to drown.

An accountant who had reviewed Swain's finances said the former Jamestown Town Council member received more than $570,000 in cash after his wife's death and said Swain spent it all in about 18 months on trips around the world. The accountant said Swain was now in debt for about $189,000.

Other witnesses from Tortola talked about Swain's alleged suspicious behavior after his wife died. A dive shop owner said Swain tried on three occasions to give away Tyre's dive gear, even though dive protocol required it be stored safely until inspected by the police. And a dive boat operator said she saw a "jovial" Swain a day or two after Tyre's death, walking down a dock with two drinks in his hand.

The jury deliberated less than three hours before finding Swain liable Feb. 24 for Tyre's death. They awarded her parents more than $3.5 million in damages.

The jury foreman said no other explanation exists for her death other than "human intervention," and that Swain was the only person near her.

"Is that proof?" asks Swain, 50, who has never been criminally charged with his wife's death. "Why was it obvious that it was human intervention?"

One of the first skills divers learn, says Swain, is how to shed your scuba gear if in trouble.

"Shelley had been trained multiple, multiple times how to get out of her gear. If someone was attacking you from your tank, what is to prevent someone from saying: 'I'm getting out of my gear' and five seconds later you are out of your gear?" with the simple release of snaps.

Olenn presented witnesses who said the tugboat wrecks which Tyre and Swain dove over that day were not overly hazardous. He told the jury that in the seven years since Shelley Tyre's death, Swain, an experienced diver, had been the only person who did not speculate about what happened to his wife.

Not true, says Swain.

"My family and friends have spent years agonizing over this issue. But the reality is we may never know. Did she bump into the wreck looking for fish? Did she have some medical thing that was just un-findable with today's technology? I don't know. Is it unfair and wrong that we don't know? Of course."

Tyre was an expert diver with more than 350 logged dives. Swain, in a videotaped deposition presented to the jury, said his wife was in good health. Still, it's not unheard of for divers to die without known reason, says Swain.

Swain says the Tyres -- "desperate for any answers against the unknown," -- hired a lawyer who promised them answers and delivered them "by the fistful."

"But that's not what happened," says Swain, "and just because you can buy a verdict . . . it doesn't prove innocence or guilt."

OLENN'S WITNESSES, says Swain, were wrong.

Take for example, Christian Thwaites, of North Kingstown and Vermont, who Swain says remains a friend.

Thwaites, along with his wife, Bernice, and their 9-year-old son, had accompanied Swain and Tyre on the trip to Tortola that March, where they chartered a sailboat.

Swain and Tyre had entered the water together. Swain surfaced about 35 minutes later. Thwaites then jumped in for his dive. Minutes later, Thwaites found Tyre lying face up on the white sandy bottom, her mouth and eyes open. He brought her to the surface where, he testified, he performed mouth-to-mouth resuscitation until Swain motored over in an inflatable dinghy.

Thwaites testified he wanted to continue rescue attempts in the dinghy, but Swain told him to stop, saying it was too late. Thwaites said he obeyed Swain because, as her husband, he "had the moral high ground."

But Swain says he did perform CPR on Shelley Tyre. He pulls out a copy of a report Thwaites wrote two months after the incident for a dive organization. In it he states: "I loosened her wet suit while David applied CPR. I believe I heard a rib crack but cannot be sure. We both continued mouth to mouth for approx five minutes. We gave up after it was clear there was no response."

"We," Swain says, pointing at the pronoun on the page.

Swain says Olenn also never introduced as evidence the Tortola medical examiner's report because it included references to bruising on the chest commonly caused by CPR.

Thwaites was out of the country last week and unavailable for comment. Olenn dismissed Thwaites' report, saying as a friend, Thwaites was giving Swain more credit than he deserved.

"Ask me any question," Swain says, "I'll answer it."

What about the report of him on the dock, carrying drinks and looking jovial a day or two after his wife died?

"That was not me," he says. "That's a crock . . ."

What about the accountant's finding that he blew through more than $570,000 in less than 18 months, most of it on trips around the world, and is now broke and in debt for $189,000?

Swain says the "lion's share" of the money went into renovations and expansions of the dive shop.

"I didn't get a loan to build this facility," he says.

When told the accountant said he received at least a $60,000 loan after Tyre died, Swain corrects himself, explaining: "Yeah, but that was just for the wood."

"Did I spend some for my personal enjoyment? Sure. Was I banned by any law not to spend it for my personal enjoyment? No."

And the $189,000 debt? Was most of it charged on some two dozen credit cards?

After a long pause, Swain says he resorted to putting the cost of even more shop renovations on the credit cards after a second mortgage fell through.

The Tortola police ruled Shelley Tyre's death an accident "unless proven otherwise," and talked about an inquest.

The Tyres and Olenn say there never was an inquest.

The Tortola police said last week the case remains open and they will consider the Rhode Island jury's finding.

"The only reason I would be worried is if I did something wrong," says Swain. "I didn't."

"Has my reputation been hurt? There's an understatement. I could have taken a job anywhere in the world. Don't you think I could have taken the money 6 1³2 years ago and gone to Mexico where they can't extradite you for a civil case? I didn't. It sometimes feels like the situation would be easier to run. But I can't do that. I didn't do anything wrong -- other than fall in love with a wonderful woman."

Swain never took the witness stand.

Olenn had subpoenaed him to testify but at the last minute changed his mind; the jury had already seen and heard three hours of videotaped testimony from him.

In his closing argument to the jury, Swain said had Olenn only put him on the stand, he could have answered many of his questions.

What Swain didn't tell the jury was he had unsuccessfully fought Olenn's subpoena.

Swain says he did so to preserve "possible legal options" in any future appeal. (Swain has until March 17 to decide if he will appeal.)

"If I didn't file that piece of paper it might hurt me later," he says. "Believe me, no one is more frustrated with the legal system than I am now."

VINDICATION, says Richard Tyre.

"That's the biggest single satisfaction."

He sits with his wife, Lisa, in a conference room at Olenn's Warwick law office with a wall full of law books behind them. It is a familiar backdrop for anyone who watched the trial.

From this room Olenn had videotaped depositions from Swain and from Mary Basler, the Warwick woman he was pursuing a relationship with before his wife's death.

"For four years," says Richard Tyre, "people came up and hugged us and said they prayed for us. But it was always for the comfort of our souls. We found out that most of them believed we were just grief-stricken parents and probably irrational. They didn't believe he [Swain] had done anything."

The other day, he says, "the head of the library called us up and said: 'All these years we were sympathetic with you, but we didn't believe. Now I believe.' "

Their neighbors in Jamestown and people elsewhere "have found out that it is not we who are wicked people who have such wicked thoughts about an innocent man," says Lisa Tyre. "It has been proven, thanks to Renn. It has been certified. The jury has testified that he really did these unspeakable things to our daughter."

The Tyres learned things during the trial, disturbing details.

"The one thing I wish came out at trial," says Richard Tyre, "was about that day when (Swain) brought back her body, I said to him in my anger, 'How come you're not showing any grief? How come you're not showing anything a husband shows for his wife who has died?' And he turned to me and said: Because I was 16 years old and standing there when my brother beat my mother to death."

"He used the term bludgeoned," adds Lisa Tyre.

Swain's brother, Richard, is serving a prison term in Minnesota for the killing.

"All these years I believed. I sort of gave him slack, because I think if you go through that you deserve slack. And then it comes out in the trial [in Swain's deposition testimony] that he was 20, and it happened far away. And he lied to us that day."

Until the trial, Richard Tyre says, he did not want to believe Swain intentionally killed his daughter.

By the time of Olenn's closing statement, he was convinced.

"I couldn't believe that one person did that to his loving wife. . . . What Renn was saying in court suddenly convinced me that he intended to kill Shelley."

The turning point came, he says, with Christian Thwaites's testimony that Swain blocked any further attempts at CPR once she was on the surface.

"He killed her twice," says Richard Tyre.

As a retired literature professor, Richard Tyre says, "I spent my life teaching that there is no such thing as pure evil. As Saint Augustine said, we always choose the greater good. And this trial has challenged my whole world view."

Shelley Tyre died on March 12, 1999.

Swain returned to Rhode Island with her body on March 19th.

Olenn says the same day Swain returned, he also gave away Shelley's beloved dog, who accompanied her to work every day.

On March 21 he called Thayer Academy in Braintree, Mass., where Shelley Tyre was a head master, and asked if he could keep her computer, to give to one of his children.

On March 26 he called Mary Basler, the woman he had a relationship with, and arranged to meet her at an East Greenwich restaurant.

By then Swain had already called an appraiser and begun the process of selling a house Tyre owned, says Olenn.

"He basically got her out of his life as fast as he could."

Swain filed for bankruptcy last fall.

The jury verdict -- if it is upheld on appeal -- will probably prevent Swain from receiving any further money from Shelley Tyre's estate. The jury also awarded the Tyres more than $3.5 million in damages.

"I'd like an apology," Richard Tyre says.

"He didn't even tell us his version of what happened to Shelley," says Lisa Tyre.

Would an apology make much difference?

"If he had resurrection powers, yeah," Richard Tyre says.

He pauses.

"No."
 
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)

February 24, 2006 Friday

HEADLINE: Jury begins deliberations in Swain trial

BYLINE: TOM MOONEY, Journal Staff Writer

In a closing statement, the defendant tries to convince jurors he is not a killer. A lawyer for the victim's parents says David Swain is lying.

PROVIDENCE - David Swain stood beside the courtroom lectern and glanced again at his notes. "This loss of the wife I so loved is a loss for all," he told the jury.

"Shutting off Shelley's air supply -- it pains me to say that -- and then holding her down, is a violent act," he said. "Zero evidence has been presented to show this defendant, me, is capable of this violence."

For 21 minutes yesterday, David Swain tried to convince a jury that he was not a killer. Then it was J. Renn Olenn's turn to make his closing statement. The lawyer representing Shelley Tyre's parents in the wrongful-death civil suit spoke for an hour and concluded that, for almost seven years, Swain has gotten away with murder.

"And the last place he has to go to get scot-free," said Olenn, "is through you."

After eight days of testimony, it is now in the hands of five women and one man to accept or reject the Tyres' allegation that Swain drowned their daughter for money during a 1999 scuba-diving vacation -- and while, at a time when he feared losing his Jamestown dive shop, he was pursuing a romance with another woman.

The Tyres are asking for at least $854,364 -- a figure representing the projected loss of their 46-year-old daughter's future earnings -- and whatever other monetary damages the jury may be inclined to order.

Swain, 50, chose not to offer a defense or to attend the proceedings for the first seven days of the trial. He eventually acted as his own attorney and called just one witness, his 30-year-old daughter, Jennifer, to bolster his claim that he was not a violent man capable of killing. Swain told the jury his "unusual defense" was part of an overall strategy to let the plaintiffs tell their "story," and then he would tell the "humble" truth.

The truth, Swain said, was his wife died in an "unfortunate, painful accident" and not as the plaintiffs' "highly paid" expert witnesses speculated.

Swain allowed that, yes, there had been some discrepancies between what he told the police in Tortola hours after Shelley Tyre drowned and what he said years later during his deposition. But "one moment to seven years is a long time to remember some things."

Swain pointed out one discrepancy involving his friend Christian Thwaites, whose wife and 9-year-old son were vacationing with Swain and Tyre on that Caribbean trip. Thwaites found Tyre's body in 80 feet of water beside the wrecks of two tugboats.

Swain said Thwaites' notes of that day indicated "we" -- meaning he and Swain -- had performed CPR on Tyre at the surface. But during his testimony, Thwaites said he thought it odd that Swain did not perform CPR on his wife.

Swain also questioned the credibility of James Philip Brown, who runs a dive shop in Tortola and recovered at the dive site some of Tyre's scuba equipment a day after she died. Several witnesses for the plaintiffs have said the condition of the equipment -- a broken mask strap and a mouthpiece missing from her snorkel -- indicated a struggle with an attacker.

"This is a man who owns a dive business ... to make money," said Swain. "You know he has an interest of what comes of this scenario."

Swain also asked the jury to consider that four years had passed from the time of the drowning to when many of the plaintiffs' experts were inspecting Tyre's scuba gear. Did any of those experts, Swain asked, study how plastic and rubber can wear down over time?

Swain also questioned the findings of Dr. Bruce A. Hyma, the chief medical examiner of Miami-Dade County in Florida, who Swain said had never examined Tyre's body, had only been "paid to review files," yet determined her death a "homicidal drowning."

"Don't you think this respected medical examiner" Swain asked, would have notified the police in Tortola about a killing if there had been one? Yet, Swain reminded the jury he had never been charged with a crime.

Swain said the plaintiffs had concluded years ago that "he did it" and then worked backwards finding the experts willing to say that.

If he had planned to kill his wife, Swain said, would he have been "so bold as to travel to a top vacation spot with close friends and their 9-year-old . . . to warm transparent tropical waters where everybody could see what's going on," when he had dived numerous times with Shelley in the cold and dark waters of Rhode Island? Would he have committed such a "heinous crime" and then left it up to a friend to find her "so his poor 9-year-old son has to witness that?"

Olenn painted a different picture of David Swain, one of a sociopath who had used all his skill as a rescue diver and instructor to kill.

"This crime has every, every element of murder," Olenn said, holding Tyre's air tank before the jury, "with the murder weapon [being] his hand on this valve."

In the last seven years, Olenn told the jury, Tortola police have not prosecuted Swain and Rhode Island authorities can't because it's outside their jurisdiction. In all that time Swain has never offered a single explanation for what happened to his wife, Olenn said.

"He's not given them an answer," he said, pointing to her parents, Lisa and Richard Tyre. "He's not given a simple answer to you." The only thing he's done is "stand up here and look at you and lie."

Olenn said this case was not generated by paid experts as Swain had charged but by "recreational divers" who suspected foul play early on, took it upon themselves to try to find answers and pleaded with Tortola officials to investigate.

Throughout it all, said Olenn, Swain has offered not the slightest interest in how his wife died.

"Each of you has shown more curiosity about the death of Shelley Tyre than her husband ever has."

"He knows, as we all know, that she battled for her life...."

She did so, Olenn speculated for the jury, with Swain on her back, performing a maneuver experienced divers like himself and Tyre train to use as a means of calming panicking divers.

The rescuing diver clings to the air tank of the other diver and in that position -- out of reach of flailing arms -- attempts to help them recover their regulator to breath or to take them to safety.

Except in this case, Olenn alleged, Swain shut off his wife's air supply, ripped off her mask and prevented her from surfacing long enough for her to drown.

Olenn told the jury Swain surfaced early in his dive not because he was chilled, as he had said in his deposition, but because "he was out of air . . . he had just killed his wife."

The jury deliberated for about 40 minutes yesterday afternoon and will resume this morning.
 
The Providence Journal (Rhode Island)
February 23, 2006 Thursday
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A-01
LENGTH: 1155 words

HEADLINE: Swain, in court, presents a defense

BYLINE: TOM MOONEY, Journal Staff Writer

Acting as his own lawyer, the Jamestown man tells jurors that his decision not to offer a defense until yesterday was "a strategic move," and then calls his daughter to testify.

David Swain took center stage at his civil trial yesterday, not as a subpoenaed witness, as expected, but as his own lawyer, addressing a jury that may begin deliberating today whether he killed his wife.

After seven days of testimony in which Swain has kept away from the proceedings, the jury saw the Jamestown dive-shop owner for the first time in person shortly after 11 a.m. when a sheriff escorted them into the courtroom.

There, sitting at the defense table, dressed in a gray suit and boat shoes without socks, was the man whose videotaped depositions they had been watching for two days. One juror appeared startled as she walked by him while the others seemed not to notice him at all.

Swain had waited until the end of his trial to offer his first defense to charges that he drowned Shelley Tyre in 1999 during a scuba-diving vacation in the British Virgin Islands.

"I'm sure you're well aware I'm David Swain," he said at the start of his opening statement, "and you probably have more questions in your mind where I've been than there are answers."

Speaking with a calm, articulate style, Swain explained he had chosen to exercise a rule in civil case law that allows defendants to be absent for some if not all of the proceedings.

"It is a strategic move to do what I am doing," he said without elaborating.

"This is an issue about loss. Loss of the Tyres. Loss of myself. Loss of my children. We've all lost a lot here. ... That's what we're here to talk about and it's a sad story."

Richard and Lisa Tyre of Jamestown filed a wrongful-death suit against Swain alleging he killed their daughter for money at a time when he was pursuing a relationship with another woman.

Swain has professed his innocence. He has never been charged with a crime and has countersued Richard Tyre for defamation. The police on the Caribbean island of Tortola ruled Tyre's death an accident "unless proven otherwise."

Throughout the trial, several expert witnesses for the plaintiffs have concluded -- based largely on the condition of some of Shelley Tyre's recovered scuba equipment -- that Swain attacked his wife from behind, shut off her air tank and held her down long enough to drown her in 80 feet of water.

Swain yesterday called the allegation "a grand story but it's just not true," . . . a "fantastic story that the plaintiffs have fabricated using their expert witnesses."

Swain, 50, said that for "close to six years the plaintiffs have been working hard to find something sordid about me. . . . They found zero violent behavior."

The only thing they did find, Swain said, was that his bother, Richard, had killed their mother. It was a "horrible incident" that Swain said took him "years to get through."

Swain asked for the jury's indulgence, saying he was not a lawyer: "I'm begging you, keep an open mind."

"In a perfect world it would be great to get beyond these tragedies. . . . We've all had enough."

SWAIN HAD been scheduled to testify yesterday morning after the Tyre's lawyer, J. Renn Olenn, had subpoenaed him, and Superior Court Judge Patricia A. Hurst had denied Swain's motion to quash that subpoena.

But after further consideration Tuesday night, Olenn said he decided yesterday morning not to call Swain after all.

"I concluded that three hours of David Swain [in videotaped depositions] was enough for anyone," Olenn said yesterday after Hurst charged the jury with instructions for deliberations.

Both Swain and Olenn are expected to give closing arguments today.

Swain arrived at court yesterday morning with his own change of plans, said Olenn, which he announced during an in-chambers conference with him and Judge Hurst.

"Mr. Swain showed up and said he was going to present a defense," said Olenn.

his 30-year-old daughter, Jennifer.

"Your honor, I'd like to call Jennifer Swain," Swain said, sounding very much like an experienced trial lawyer.

"Do you recall your deposition on or about May 2003?" Swain asked his daughter, one of two children he has from a previous marriage.

Jennifer Swain then recounted how Olenn has asked her questions during that deposition concerning the meeting she attended with her father at the home of Richard and Lisa Tyre shortly after David Swain returned to Rhode Island with Shelley Tyre's body.

Under her father's questioning, she described the gathering as a "family meeting" which grew "emotionally charged."

"It was emotional because of what happened," she said. "We all lost Shelley. Death is never easy for anybody."

Richard Tyre was particularly upset, she said. He wanted to know why David Swain had not been with Shelley Tyre at the time of her death.

The jury has heard David Swain say in depositions that he and Shelley Tyre had split up during their dive and that he had no idea what happened to cause her drowning.

"The sticking point was you weren't with Shelley when she died," Jennifer Swain said.

Despite the frustration over the lack of answers, Jennifer Swain said emotions between the Tyres and her father eventually calmed and they set about working together to make funeral arrangements.

"So this emotionally charged family meeting where a very horrible accident happened ... at some point ... went back to being a family?" David Swain asked.

"Yes."

BEFORE JENNIFER Swain's testimony -- and with the jury in recess -- Hurst denied Olenn's motion that the judge rule in the plaintiffs' favor without the jury having to deliberate the case.

Olenn said based on the testimony he had presented and the fact that Swain had produced no evidence challenging that testimony, any reasonable person would find in favor of the Tyres.

Said Hurst flatly: "I'll need more than that."

"What if [the jury] didn't find some of your experts credible?" she asked.

The judge raised one example where Olenn's experts were basing their opinions on an unsubstantiated assumption: that Shelley Tyre's air tank held 3,000 pounds of compressed air when she entered the water and therefore she died about eight minutes afterwards, based on the remaining air in the tank. What if the tank actually held more or less than that, the judge asked. Wouldn't that sway the findings as to when she died?

"The jury has to determine," Hurst said, "whether those underlying facts have been proved to their satisfaction."

The Tyres are asking for unspecified monetary damages.

In a civil trial, the burden of proof is less than the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in criminal cases.

A civil jury only has to prove that the defendant is liable by a "preponderance of the evidence" or, in other words, is more likely than not to have done what is alleged.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom