Hank49:
That's interesting. If you become a GUE instructor you're actually monitored and if you dive outside DIR protocols openly, you're out?
That seems a bit extreme. As long as you officially teach within the rules, what does GUE care if an instructor dives 150 feet on air on his/her own time? Or uses non DIR gear sometimes? Do they even have a legal right to revoke one's license for that?
There are very few GUE instructors, look at the list... I wouldn't say they are actively 'monitored', thats so big-brother.... Becoming a GUE instructor is a fairly involved undertaking, part of the genesis of GUE was dis-satisfaction with the status-quo of some of the other training agencies and the gross variances between instructors and lack of consistency in the 'message' being taught to students.
Instructors are not issued a 'license', instructors, in good standing, are authorized to offer classes and submit their students for certification by the agency. If an instructor is no longer in good standing with the agency, for whatever reason, they will no longer be able to offer that training, or certify divers, i.e. issue that card. If I recall, after all GUE classes, students are asked to complete a QA survey, and I'd imagine if anyone had an issue, they could email the qa folks; who WILL investigate and take appropriate action if warrented.
Within the concepts taught in DIR classes, advocating deep air is the anti-thesis of DIR, for a number of reasons. Obviously in any dive related activity, a GUE instructor is expected to be setting an example of what it means to dive DIR, much like say the NFL has a code of professional conduct. (For example, its not the allegations of slaughtering dogs thats going to get Michael Vick in trouble w/ the NFL, it's the allegation of betting on them fighting...!)
-Tim