SCUBA PRO MK 17 260 OR MK 17 620 TI ???

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

rsingler:
The decreased size of the hole in the mouthpiece is deliberate. It introduces enough turbulence to impede initiation of freeflow despite the assistance of the Venturi vane. The two components are engineered together.
Using an off-brand mouthpiece with a large hole will make the flow dynamics different, and the reg will be more prone to freeflow.
Click to expand...
That makes sense, easily controlled free flow is an issue for some but not for me. Without the mouthpiece and with the venturi vane set to impede flow, the A700 does not readily free flow. Move the vane and it will possibly free flow.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PADaryL
Regulator dilemma (first buy, new to diving) [scubapro] MK 25/19 evo (BT) G260 cb/S620 ti
5 6 7
Replies
63
Views
2,784
BoltSnap
BoltSnap
L
Question Atomic question, what exactly did I buy here? Atomic Titanium 2nd stage
Replies
4
Views
977
lnjohn
L
D
Which of these would you keep, and which would you sell?
Replies
8
Views
640
halocline
H
Erik22
Scuba Pro MK V w/ 109 “Cold” Free Flow
Replies
6
Views
886
rsingler
rsingler
M
Advice on Scubapro regs: Mk25 EVO/D420 vs MK19 EVO/ D420
2 3
Replies
21
Views
3,197
whitefang21
whitefang21
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/

Back
Top Bottom