- Messages
- 22,171
- Reaction score
- 2,790
- # of dives
- 5000 - ∞
I don’t doubt that they have some (maybe all) staff with great skills and ability, but given what I perceive to be the upper management of Scuba Science Inc’s lack of moral fiber I’d not do business with them. I don’t like to shake hands with people and then have to count my fingers when I get my hand back.Stephen Ash:… These are instructors that I would trust with my life. As a matter of fact, I have turned to them on occasion for advice on some critical matters involving my own training. Heck... I'd love to have some of their staff at our store.
Your comment above is out of line and I suspect you'll find that many of the folks here who have spoken out against some of the business tactics of this store will rally in defense of their instruction staff, their training programs and their family of divers.
That’s what makes a horse race.sjspeck:I've got to go with Stephen on this one...
The lousy service provided by Scuba Sciences Inc. and poor response by Scuba Sciences Inc. to a customer complaint is not the issue that concerns me. It’s the misrepresentation of senior staff shilling as a consumer and then denying it when caught with her hand in the cookie jar followed by silence from the owners.sjspeck:All you've witnessed is an exchange of opinions on a public forum about the alleged improper servicing of a regulator from 2000 miles away. From a group of strangers who mostly have some vested interest in either position for the most part.No comment except that you are correct about future queries.
Again, the lousy service provided by Scuba Sciences Inc. and poor response by Scuba Sciences Inc. to a customer complaint is not the issue that concerns me …sjspeck:The facts are that the alleged wrong doing was in fact never proven. Although the reporting of the incident does seem to support your perceived position, in fact what it really comes down to is SSI's position on the incident vs. Cjust's. The only people who can be absolutely sure of what happened are those individuals that had the reg in their possession for some part of the time period from when it was serviced until it failed. There was a myriad of potential opinions on how it occurred but no one is able to state with absolute certainty what did happen. Your opinion from 2000 miles away is just one of them. And your opinion was empirically derived from a combination of cjust's report, SSI's reply and gossip, hearsay and negative criticism from many others - you and myself included. As was my opinion....
Yes, Tina (the sock puppet shill and head clacker) of Scuba Sciences Inc. brought it back to the fore. I had let the tread drop.sjspeck:Really is anyone here asking you to?...
I don’t see that as a “failure.”sjspeck:What you're failing to do is separate your opinion of the management of the store from the potential for professionalism as demonstrated by the instructors and divecons in their store.
I can point you to any number of highly skilled, well known divers whom I will not dive with because I do not fell that I can trust them. Scuba Science Inc.’s inability to admit error and take it like a man, puts them in the same category.sjspeck:In fact there are two separate locations so would you have us believe that all of them are guilty by association of what you claim? Some of the most highly regarded instructors in this area work out of their stores including several that have national reputations in their fields. I've read unsolicited recommendations from highly respected SB members posted in other forums here on at least one occasion for a member of their staff
You state that you're not in any position to judge their expertise, then in the next sentence you lump them all together and dismiss them en masse. I know from personal experience that the instructors in that store have their own set of standards independent of the management that they work for. As I'm sure most instructors in your area do also.Might be good advice for you also. Why do you continue to bait here and in other posts:But it's not only you, there are others who continue to try to provoke a response here.Personally I think you're way out of line. And for the record I do personally feel that the situation was likely caused by an unwitting error at Scuba Sciences but that's just my opinion. Although my position may have a little more merit as I live here, visit the store semi-regularly, and do have my Zeagle gear serviced there. (only Zeagle dealer in town) Frankly I'll check it a little more thoroughly now than I have in the past but that's just human nature... .
Tina posted raves about her workplace while omitting mention of her affiliation. That’s proven. Tina denies sock puppeting, claims to have used just one account, which is clearly not true. The upper management of Scuba Sciences Inc has chosen to remain mum on her actions. She has no call to be offended; she brought this down on herself. I’ve done naught but tell the truth, they’ve done naught but lie, obfusticate and the pretend it didn’t happen.sjspeck:And lastly I think Tina has every right to be offended. Wouldn't you be if I made an equally unsubstantiated comment about the Sea Rovers?
Please, say whatever you want about the Sea Rovers, like this situation, in the end it will rise or fall on its own merits. Karma will out.
I’m not putting “their courses, instructors or DM’s into question, I’m saying that I’d not do any kind of business with Scuba Sciences Inc. because, at the upper levels, they appear to me to be dishonest.shark.byte.usa:While I may not agree with some (maybe a lot) of Scuba Sciences business practices and quote on quote "Management’s IMO mishandling of the odd customer service issue and I've certainly spoken up about those. Never on this forum has their courses, instructors or DM's come into question.
How could you possibly do that? She lies. Bold face lies. I couldn’t possibly let her anywhere near any one I care about.shark.byte.usa:Personally, I was certified there and can attest to their having the highest quality OW course that I know of and my instructor was top-notch. Even after having issues with the shop, I still chose to take my son back for the same OW course and instructor. I've said it before and I'll say it again, but if my 11yo daughter wanted to be in Scuba Rangers or something similar, Tina would be the instructor I would call first, no question about it.
I don’t doubt that. But there’s an old saying, “When you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas.” Perhaps it is wrong to paint them all with the same brush. You say that there are some great instructors there who can do good well, and I have to believe you. Perhaps these incidents will help them to see whom it is that they work for and encourage them to find an employer who is more worth of their excellent skills.shark.byte.usa:I've had the pleasure of diving with many of their DM's and they are some of the finest, most knowledgeable & approachable divers I know. I am appreciative anytime I am able to dive with them, I always learn something new.