I've got to go with Stephen on this one...
Thalassamania:
I don't know you. I don't care to know you. But I have witnessed how you conduct your affairs.
All you've
witnessed is an exchange of opinions on a public forum about the alleged improper servicing of a regulator from 2000 miles away. From a group of strangers who mostly have some vested interest in either position for the most part.
Please, take all the offense that you want, be my guest. The more you huff and puff, the more people laugh at you and the higher these treads go on Google when someone equerries "Scuba Sciences." So please, please, continue to screw yourself.
No comment except that you are correct about future queries.
The facts are that you left all honesty behind when first you started sock puppet using, shill shrieking, and clacking and second when you refused to acknowledge your wrong doing and face the music.
The
facts are that the
alleged wrong doing was in
fact never proven. Although the reporting of the incident does seem to support your perceived position, in
fact what it really comes down to is SSI's position on the incident vs. Cjust's. The only people who can be absolutely sure of what happened are those individuals that had the reg in their possession for some part of the time period from when it was serviced until it failed. There was a myriad of potential
opinions on how it occurred but no one is able to state with absolute certainty what did happen. Your
opinion from 2000 miles away is just one of them. And your
opinion was empirically derived from a combination of cjust's report, SSI's reply and gossip, hearsay and negative criticism from many others - you and myself included. As was my
opinion....
I'm dead on topic. I can not recommend that anyone undertake advanced (or for that matter any level) of training at Scuba Sciences Inc.
Really is anyone here asking you to?...
It has nothing to do with expertise, which I am not in a position to judge. The reason is that you must, to effectively learn, be able to trust your instructor with your life, and if the management of that store is demonstrably not trustworthy, how could anyone in their right mind trust their life to the instructors of that store?
What you're failing to do is separate your opinion of the management of the store from the potential for professionalism as demonstrated by the instructors and divecons in their store. In fact there are two separate locations so would you have us believe that all of them are guilty by association of what you claim? Some of the most highly regarded instructors in this area work out of their stores including several that have national reputations in their fields. I've read unsolicited recommendations from highly respected SB members posted in other forums here on at least one occasion for a member of their staff.
You state that you're not in any position to judge their expertise, then in the next sentence you lump them all together and dismiss them en masse. I know from personal experience that the instructors in that store have their own set of standards independent of the management that they work for. As I'm sure most instructors in your area do also.
Might be good advice for you also. Why do you continue to bait here and in other posts:
Originally Posted by Thalassamania
But how can you trust anything that they say?
But it's not only you, there are others who continue to try to provoke a response here.
Personally I think you're way out of line. And for the record I
do personally feel that the situation was likely caused by an unwitting error at Scuba Sciences but that's just my
opinion. Although my position may have a little more merit as I live here, visit the store semi-regularly, and do have my Zeagle gear serviced there. (only Zeagle dealer in town) Frankly I'll check it a little more thoroughly now than I have in the past but that's just human nature...
And lastly I think Tina has every right to be offended. Wouldn't you be if I made an equally unsubstantiated comment about the Sea Rovers?