Don't get me wrong, I see plenty of those too.
Just saying that it's quite possible for a diver to have a wing that's sufficient in theory, but insufficient in practice.
If the diver is properly weighted for cold water single tank diving, i.e. eyelevel at the surface with no gas in their wing and a full cylinder then:
They have 100% of their wing's capacity to get their chin out of the water. That requires only a fraction of capacity of a 26, or 30 lbs wing.
The impacts of a buoyancy failure are pretty small as the diver is not relying on their wing to remain at the surface.
At the end of the dive the diver will be lighter by the weight of the gas they consumed, meaning they will be positively buoyant at the surface even when their wing is empty.
The diver needs enough wing to:
1) Float their rig when it is at it's most negative, when their cylinder is full. Sea conditions have little impact on this, if the rig is less than 26 lbs negative a 26 lbs wing will float it.
2) Have enough lift to compensate for the maximum possible change in buoyancy of their exposure suit.
If the diver is properly weighted and has
not placed 100% of their ballast on their rig the buoyancy of the suit will dictate wing size.
Comfort at the surface is improved for the properly weighted diver, they need less gas in *ANY* size wing to get their chin out of the water.
Huge wings don't really help much to raise an over weighted diver out of the water, any portion of the wing that is above the surface offers no lift as it displaces no water. Big wings pretty quickly reach a point of diminishing returns.
Getting the weighting right, and the ballast distribution right pays far bigger returns than an over sized wing.
Far too often is see divers choosing a larger wing to solve an over weighting issue.
Tobin