Agreed, while I am a diver, early 50s living in the United States, I am anything but an adult!These studies are speaking about adult Americans, you are speaking about divers. Two different groups.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Agreed, while I am a diver, early 50s living in the United States, I am anything but an adult!These studies are speaking about adult Americans, you are speaking about divers. Two different groups.
These studies are speaking about adult Americans, you are speaking about divers. Two different groups.
If you don't provide a proof that divers (not only American divers!), on average, have the same culture, physical issues, and bias of adult Americans, you just can't use those articles.
Nope. That's why I ended my post with "I have no idea."I am a data guy and I know you like facts too do you know if there is any research that try to understand how much spread this syndrome is? And, even more interesting, if there's a trend in time?
I have no doubt some dive in spite of risks. Here is a truly frightening story.So where they unaware of their cardiac issues prior to death, or were they diving in-spite of their knowledge of the risks.
"Cardiac-related medical problems are a leading cause of death in divers and risk factors for an acute coronary event are well documented even in dive professionals, including smoking, overweight/obesity, and high blood pressure"
So where they unaware of their cardiac issues prior to death, or were they diving in-spite of their knowledge of the risks.
Shreeves K, Buzzacott P, Hornsby A, Caney M. Violations of safe diving practices among 122 diver fatalities. Int Marit Health. 2018;69(2):94-98. doi: 10.5603/IMH.2018.0014. PMID: 29939385.
You are speaking of the divers who died. But there are all the others.
To be clear, I am not saying you are wrong in your conclusions. I see different findings, but you might be right, and I might be wrong (or vice versa). Who knows, with the little data we have?
What I am saying is that you are using and interpreting data improperly. The data you are citing says nothing about the issue we are discussing.
@crofrog,The following is supported by data in the studies I cited. Feel free to post studies of something other than your opinion to refute it. If 40% of people ...
The following is supported by data in the studies I cited. Feel free to post studies of something other than your opinion to refute it. If 40% of people that reflect the general population are unaware of their CVD risk factors, and the leading cause of death in divers is cardiac events, then the question that needs to be answered is:
So were they unaware of their cardiac issues prior to death, or were they diving in spite of their knowledge of the risks?
well good news I cited all of the studies. So feel free to dig into them.@crofrog,
Percentages can be tricky. At the very least I would like to know the numerator and denominator. And how the sampling was done. Divers are such a small fraction of the general population. So, unless the random (?) sample was very large (or, maybe, stratified), it is unlikely that many (if any) divers were captured by the sample--which is important if divers are unlike others, in general (which is probably true, I think).
My apologies if you already know this. Your profile contains very little about you.
rx7diver