Saltwater_Parrot
Registered
I don't think anyone is speaking in absolutes or saying that these possibilities are facts, just that they are potential contributing factors. Just as you are saying they have not been proven, they also have not been disprovenYou're telling me that shooting the Shiite with dive instructors about complex environmental issues at tea time is now the basis for coming to scientific conclusions? Yeah, the new Middlestern contribution to the world, science by rumor. Actually, in reality that's how decisions are made in my part of the world, based on rumor. Tea shops are the center of power and decision making for science.
Scientific studies always start with a hypothesis, and the hypotheses are essentially educated guesses. Many studies, especially in the ecology/conservation sphere, use local knowledge when forming those hypotheses, so it's not outlandish to say that "a is possible because b has been observed." It needs to start somewhere.
There's a lot of debate in this field about baiting, artificial feeding behaviors, and so on, so none of these ideas are hard facts.. just ideas that need further study.
Also, just because something has been going on for years does not discount anything. There are so many variations and other factors --
- Increase in shark populations could mean increased pressure on food supply, where the dumping was sufficient in the past to supplement, but no longer is
- The inverse could also be true -- perhaps dumping has slowed down due to better conditions on the ships, leading to an increased strain on the sharks feeding habits if they had become dependent upon these dumps
-Or, it could be completely unrelated and just chance -- or something entirely different like food supply strain induced via rising sea temperature/ocean acidity.