DennisW
Contributor
I for one have dived both areas and love them both. They each have their own attributes and are fun dives. Thanks much for the trip report and the pictures.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Dan,
You touch on what I see as a lot of different subjects… I agree and disagree with you at the same time. I’m going to try and explain myself as best as I can.
I think one of the best dives in PBC is a “baby dive.” Blue Heron Bridge has an amazing amount of tiny animal life. That’s not to say there isn’t other amazing life out there, but I’ve never been let down by BHB. It’s not technically challenging to dive at all, but it always feels like an adventure to me. I’ve had three experiences with large underwater animals that really stand out to me among all of the amazing dives,
-turtles off Boynton in PBC. The water was 65-68* and I paid over $80 for the dive. They were pretty darn cool.
-A bull shark that cruised by me on the Spiegle. I paid over $70 for the dive and it wasn’t that cold. It showed me that sharks aren’t dangerous like JAWS for real, very cool.
-a large eagle ray that came out of nowhere at BHB. Flew around me in a circle twice then disappeared. It was mind blowingly beautiful, an amazing interaction with nature for me. The water was in the 80’s, the dive was free, and it was the only experience I got atleast a somewhat decent picture of…won’t earn me any respect among photographers but it helps me remember how pumped up I was to experience that moment alone with such a beautiful and graceful animal.
I say all that because I disagree wholeheartedly with the idea of a “baby” and “adventure” classification. I get what you mean by the technical challenges and skill required for some dives, but I don’t think you need technical challenges in order for a dive to be absolutely amazing and the best adventure ever.
I’m not disagreeing with you that PBC has amazing dives. Some of my favourite boats run out of PBC. I can see where you might feel that PBC is not in the forefront of people’s minds when they discuss traveling here to dive. I’m sure that is frustrating. You have amazing dive sites, but people go to the places that advertise more. But I think that having more divers, wherever they dive, is great. And, I think that divers visiting Florida in any form are easier to get to visit PBC than divers who don’t visit Florida. Plus, you can show the economic boon that divers are to the Keys to get support for diving business in other areas.
I simply don’t see the point of saying some dives are better than others. A dive is an adventure to me if I see something new, or get to take great pictures, or get to introduce people to my favourite sites (some of which are “baby” dives). I thrive on the enjoyment of diving. When I’m trying to get someone to go on a dive with me, I tell them about how amazing it is, but I don’t see the sense in asking them to prove that their typical site is better. I tell them about why I love the site I’d like to take them to, and let my infectious enthusiasm get them enthused. It did backfire on me once, when the cave was much harder to get into than I had explained, and the viz was 5 feet instead of the 50 I’d told them to expect.
Here is my sales pitch for PBC: “You know how you typically fly in to FLL and drive two hours south to the Keys? Why don’t you drive an hour north to Boynton? You can dive off Boynton one day, go to Jupiter the next, then dive BHB before driving to Orlando for a day at the themeparks to finish offgassing before flying home. You’ll get to see more because a lot of the dives are drift dives, you don’t even have to swim back to an anchor line, the boat just picks you up, and you’ll see much more reef.”
You yourself pointed out that the masses of divers would probably do better in placid conditions. I’m sure you see the constant deluge of posts on this forum about the quality of dive training. I wonder why there aren’t more chain diving stores in Florida. Just think, if you owned a shop in Key West, Key Largo, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Boynton and Jupiter. You’d be able to take people to most of the best diving. You could make deals with hotels and offer package deals to customers. Sure, they might find you originally because they were partying in Key West and take a class from you on a whim. But then when they visit again, if you impress them with your quality and value, you’ve got the chance to market your other locations. You can help them pick the best shop to dive out of based on their wants and qualifications.
I think something like that is what will drive people to branch out. I’m hesitant to visit a new dive op without a recommendation from a friend, but if it was a franchise, then I’d know to expect the same great service at the same price at every location. So, I’d visit every location!
I understand what you mean about challenges for divers who can take on those challenges. To me, my challenge is what I said above: see new things, take great pictures, and introduce people to the sites I love. But, that doesn’t stop me from also having technical challenges. I don’t expect to set world records for depth, but I’m looking forward to spending more time deeper than 150, perhaps make it a habit to visit 300’. One of my favourite dives involves navigating 4300’ back in a cave to close a circuit, typically involving double stages and a scooter and sometimes done solo. Of course, one of my other favourite dives is in 10 feet of water at Blue Heron Bridge. I enjoy taking people to both places, but it’s easier to find people to go to BHB.
So in short, I support diving PBC, it has some of the world’s best sites. I also support diving Broward and Miami-Dade counties. I understand what you mean by wanting technical challenges, but for my own sanities sake (because it’s not always possible to increase those technical challenges, or to dive those challenging sites year round), I’ve learned to keep my focus on just enjoying diving. For that reason, I think classifying dives as “easy” or “adventurous” is not the best way to look at it, as they are not mutually exclusive. I’d rather classify on two scales, one is ease of diving, from buy-a-card to buy-life-insurance, and the other would be enjoyment of the dive, which could be from I-loved-it to I-FREAKING-LOVED-IT!!!!!!
I get pissed about dive magazines NEVER covering this kind of place,
Why Dan? To be honest I would much rather dive a place with less divers than with more.
I suppose that is a valid point...though most of the places I am referring to, are quite large, and there would be little chance of divers ever being in any concentration in these places. And this is not for ALL divers, just the ones that are LOOKING FOR this kind of Adventure. Maybe the 10% that would really like this. But this 10% gets lied to by the big print magazines.
Maybe it's just me - but I had to smile when I read Reck Diver's post. I took it as totally tongue-in-cheek.