divinh
Contributor
I have a Cressi Giotto. I also have a Sherwood Vision. I've read that the Giotto is more conservative than the Vision. I've also read that it's best to leave the dive computer's alone and not bother to try to "match" the algorithms, i.e. set them to have similar conservatism or liberalism. I would be fine being limited by the Giotto for its conservatism. But... if I really wanted to match them up similarly, how would I do it? There's the Dive Plan, which would be a start to match them, but how would I get them to show what subsequent dives would be like?
CRESSI GIOTTO
CRESSI RGBM algorithm. New algorithm created through a collaboration between Cressi and Bruce Wienke, based on the Haldane model, integrated with RGBM factors for safe decompression calculations in repetitive multi-day dives.
Tissues: 9 with saturation half-times between 2.5 and 480 minutes
SHERWOOD VISION
• Modified Haldanean based Pelagic DSAT, algorithm.
• No Deco limits closely follow PADI RDP.
• Decompression in agreement with Buhlmann ZHL-16c and French MN90.
• No Deco Deep Stops >> Morroni, Bennett.
• Deco Deep Stops (not recommended) >> Blatteau, Gerth, Gutvik.
• Altitude >> Buhlmann, IANTD, RDP (Cross).
• Altitude corrections and O2 limits based on NOAA tables
CRESSI GIOTTO
CRESSI RGBM algorithm. New algorithm created through a collaboration between Cressi and Bruce Wienke, based on the Haldane model, integrated with RGBM factors for safe decompression calculations in repetitive multi-day dives.
Tissues: 9 with saturation half-times between 2.5 and 480 minutes
SHERWOOD VISION
• Modified Haldanean based Pelagic DSAT, algorithm.
• No Deco limits closely follow PADI RDP.
• Decompression in agreement with Buhlmann ZHL-16c and French MN90.
• No Deco Deep Stops >> Morroni, Bennett.
• Deco Deep Stops (not recommended) >> Blatteau, Gerth, Gutvik.
• Altitude >> Buhlmann, IANTD, RDP (Cross).
• Altitude corrections and O2 limits based on NOAA tables