Error 130 dives on Fake Nitrox

This Thread Prefix is for incidents caused by the diver, buddy, crew, or anyone else in the "chain".

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

If a diver uses a dive computer, he and only he is responsible to understand how it works for the type of dive he is doing. He and only he will suffer the consequences of possibly making a mistake.
 
If a diver uses a dive computer, he and only he is responsible to understand how it works for the type of dive he is doing.
True, but an attitude that is not that common.
He and only he will suffer the consequences of possibly making a mistake.
False, but an attitude that is all too common. Ever been on a dive boat where someone got DCS? Everybody is affected, especially if the boat has to abort and head back to shore for emergency services. And if there is a death, then the other divers are likely scarred for life. What we do -- no matter how puffed up we feel about it -- has consequences to others.
 
False, but an attitude that is all too common. Ever been on a dive boat where someone got DCS?
I agree this statement is false but not knowing how to use your computer may not even be as serious as ending up with DCS. I was recently in Raja Ampat and a diver in my group had multiple computers she didn’t know how to use. During a dive when we were maybe 30 minutes in at 30ft deep she was convinced her computer was telling her her NDL was 2 minutes. She was upset and showing the dive guide. Luckily he knew the computer was wrong and waved her away. If he had been less experienced or she had been more stubborn maybe that could have ended my dive. Of course after the dive I asked her if she read the manual and understood her computer settings and unsurprisingly she said no.
 
If a diver uses a dive computer, he and only he is responsible to understand how it works for the type of dive he is doing. He and only he will suffer the consequences of possibly making a mistake.
When I was diving on a liveaboard in the Galapagos, our initial briefing warned us that for much of the trip, we would be so far from civilization that if we had a DCS incident, no help could be sent to us. We would have to transport the stricken diver to a location where help could be sent, and that would be 24 hours in one direction and 24 hours back. Given that our entire trip was one week, we got the message.

Despite that warning, yes, we did an instance in which one of the divers (a certified DM--my buddy) did not understand his computer or the decompression science behind it, and we had another case in which a diver was able to borrow a computer, explaining that his had malfunctioned. It turned out the "malfunction" was the computer shutting him out for violating decompression limits.
 
Yeas ago I bought a second hand Zeagle N2ition which allowed for three nitrox mixes only to discover that it reset itself to air after every dive. At the time I thought "effing lawyers," this is an annoying/imbecilic "safety" feature produced by dive nannies who must think divers are idiots-no one could be stupid enough to dive air on a 32% setting.

Guess not.
 
My first dive computer - an Aeris Atmos 2 - defaults ( I think - but it’s definitely an option) to resetting to a 50% mix after each Nitrox dive. I still haven’t decided if that’s a good idea or not.
 
There was some computer that would reset to a fictive 50% O2 / 79% N2 mix, thus giving the nitrogen loading of air with the MOD of the hottest nitrox mix. I guess it makes some sort of sense as a worst-case default to protect against a forgotten gas setting.
 
My old Archimedes II will sound alarm if I attempt to dive again after a NITROX dive; I have to set the %O2 again. My new Leonardo 2.0 couldn't care less but maybe it is missing a valuable safety feature?
 
My old Archimedes II will sound alarm if I attempt to dive again after a NITROX dive; I have to set the %O2 again. My new Leonardo 2.0 couldn't care less but maybe it is missing a valuable safety feature?

It's a lose-lose design decision: if you chose to reset O2% after each dive, you'll p*ss off nitrox divers (esp. with a single-button computer like the Leo). If you chose to not reset, that may be an accident waiting to happen. Whichever you chose, you'll make someone unhappy.
 
Her
It's a lose-lose design decision: if you chose to reset O2% after each dive, you'll p*ss off nitrox divers (esp. with a single-button computer like the Leo). If you chose to not reset, that may be an accident waiting to happen. Whichever you chose, you'll make someone unhappy.
Well, if our world was perfect, won't this be a little too boring?
 

Back
Top Bottom