I wonder what, if anything, the effect of the multiple complaints to indiegogo on the first incarnation of the campaign were? Did that contribute to them restarting the campaign and refunding the original backers funds? Because I'm damn sure they wouldn't have refunded over $900k if they didn't feel forced in to it.
Probably the growing wave of negative publicity was a factor and there were definitely some backers demanding refunds but I wonder if that would be enough to cause them to change their story, wave goodbye to the $900k and start again when the dollar total was still going up.
In some ways, the reboot was a cunning move - even though the revised claim of liquid oxygen is just as ludicrous as the first, the short attention span of the Internet and story fatigue will ensure that it won't be reported on (negatively) as widely. Even diligent debunkers have to shrug their shoulders at some point when people seem to be so eager to be fooled.
The word seemed to be getting through that the 'gills' claim was nonsense and the original video was a fake, it's just incredible that people are then willing to accept them doubling down with another laughable claim on liquid oxygen and a second video that is pretty much exactly what you would come up with if you needed to cobble together a hidden scuba tank and breathing tube arrangement to make a "longer" video with "more bubbles".
Is there any point in reporting it to indiegogo again? Maybe, but I doubt it. So it's time to sit back, put the popcorn back in the cupboard, wait for the howls of anger when the scammed don't receive their impossible product in December or ever, and just shrug 'we told you so'...