Drinking age to 18 or voting age to 21. Or better yet military age to 21. 20 years ago I was in the NAVY at the age of 19 working on the electronics of an F14 fighter, but I could not drink a beer.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's because the laws are written by lawyers. The intent is to obfuscate so some pinhead can "interpret" the law, then another pinhead can "get his/her client off" because they technically did not break the law. Then they'll craft another law to close the loophole. The cycle then repeats.
Peter Guy:Green wrote:
NOT to get too far off topic, but I just have to respond to this one. This can only have been written by someone who has absolutely no knowledge of the subject because this response is so wrong on so many levels -- but the most important one is the reasons why so many laws are unclear. Those reasons come down to two:
a. Nobody is smart enough to be able to write a general law which will cover all possible situations; and
b. Getting two people to agree on what "the definition of is is" is hard enough -- and getting 50 or 200 people to agree on what a word means is impossible. Since laws are a compromise among the people who pass them, ambiguity is inevitable -- and where there is ambiguity there will be disagreement on what is meant.
I am very proud to have had the opportunity to help the citizens of my state by writing the language of the statutes that govern some of their conduct. The fact that there is ambiguity in the meaning has nothing to do with the fact that I'm an attorney and the author of the words.
BTW, there were any number of times when the legislators decided to make a statute more ambiguous than necessary so that every legislator could then say "This means 'X'" to different constituents! Making sausage can be pretty ugly some times.
Attorneys don't need to write laws in an ambiguous manner in order to get paying clients. Just passing a new law is sufficient!
Green_Manelishi:Perhaps common sense should be a significant portion of law making? That might reduce the ambiguity.
Green_Manelishi:1) no read english? no vote.
2) no speak english? no vote.
3) undocumented/temporary guest worker? no vote.
4) a guest of this country? No complain, otherwise go home
thomjinx:How about a law requiring huge SUVs to have turn signals?
catherine96821:Mexicans get a bad rap.
I love that culture...till we mess them up.
when I see them struggling to make change and speak English in McDonalds...I wonder how many Americans would do that.
Green_Manelishi:1) no read english? no vote.
2) no speak english? no vote.