@johndiver999
Yeah, not going to take your lead in personally. You obviously did not understand the question I was posing. That might be a result of my less than stellar writing skills. I do have pretty good reading comprehension though. In post #8 it seemed like you are arguing against feeding sharks?
Yet in response to my query you wrote.
My point is/was if a person thinks IT IS DANGEROUS to feed a grizzly bear (something I find painfully obvious), why would the same person think IT IS NOT DANGEROUS to feed a Tiger Shark? There is a paradox, dichotomy here that baffles me entirely. It has nothing to do with my understanding of the ocean or sharks, but far more with my lack of understanding in fellow human beings.
Yeah, not going to take your lead in personally. You obviously did not understand the question I was posing. That might be a result of my less than stellar writing skills. I do have pretty good reading comprehension though. In post #8 it seemed like you are arguing against feeding sharks?
Because it is unwise, dangerous and unnecessary to artificially aggregate and feed dangerous wild animals (alligators, bear and sharks, for example) and train them to associate humans with food.
Yet in response to my query you wrote.
"Shark Dives" are critical for the protection of these beautiful and ecologically ESSENTIAL species. We must reach the public (and especially divers and fisherman) to help them understand that sharks are intelligent, graceful and a beautiful part of our natural world. Healthy marine ecosystems, especially in warm water, always have an abundance of shark species present.
My point is/was if a person thinks IT IS DANGEROUS to feed a grizzly bear (something I find painfully obvious), why would the same person think IT IS NOT DANGEROUS to feed a Tiger Shark? There is a paradox, dichotomy here that baffles me entirely. It has nothing to do with my understanding of the ocean or sharks, but far more with my lack of understanding in fellow human beings.