CathyE
Contributor
Wow, lotsa hate for airlines!That's not equivalent at all.
Airlines have thousnds of flights and millions of customers over which to spread their risk. They operate bucket pricing to jack prices up for poeple who don't have flexibility or to improve profitability. In many cases it is not a luxury purchase but non-voluntary travel. Try flying to the opposite hemisphere for your dead father's funeral within 24 hours and tell me how you get on. And finally when airline incompetence and poor management makes them insolvent, tax payers end up digging them out.
Dive boats on the other hand are usually small businesses running on the edge of solvency as the owners do it for love as much as money. A couple of zero revenue launches could be the difference between them going under or keeping going for another year. If they go under we are sometimes left with routes and sites that no longer have any service whatsoever. I have never operated a dive business but having dealt with insurance for decades I would be surprised if a medical emergency would pay out on a terminated dive trip. Happy to be corrected here if I am wrong.
Personally, I am willing to help fund diving optionality by eating a trip or two over my lifetime in the case of a medical emergency. I would also be happy to receive a free trip if the dive operator offered it, either because they can afford it or insurance paid out.
When was the last time you tipped your airline/desk agent/captain/steward/ess for their service? You didn't? That's completely disingenuous of you.
So it’s okay to expect a big company to step up, and pay out, but the poor small, struggling boat companies need to be treated like charity cases. Got it!
What does tipping have to do with anything?
FYI. It has happened that after landing at X airport and handing off ill passenger to EMTs the flight crew no longer had enough hours to continue the flight. Aircraft returned to original airport and passengers were re-booked on different flights at no extra cost.Your post is the not equivalent.
Say the dive boat pax has a heart attack between dive 1 and dive 2. The equivalency would be the airliner having left Chicago an hour ago and an hour left to Houston and turns around. Airliners don’t do that, they land wherever they can, then continue the trip because the plane needs to be in the next place. In your equivalency experiment, the same would be that the boat never gets out of the marina, and turns around, and no dives are completed. The boat hasn’t burned any fuel, and the crew then has to eat it.
As mentioned, when I looked at DAN insurance I couldn’t see any mention of reimbursement for anyone other that the insured. I think you would have to sue the person themself, that would definitely be an a-hole move. Only the lawyers would win.No one is saying that dive ops can only be profitable by ripping off customers. No one is saying they are happy about a missed dive. No one is saying they dont deserve some sort of refund. No one is saying it is great customer service to not make the customer whole. You are 100% factually correct in that you are paying for something and not getting what you paid for. To me context is important and impacts my narrative and how I react to the situation. That doesn't invalidate your narrative. I was literally playing back your example, language and narrative to you so don't have a cow. Let's hope none of us have to miss any dives!
Question... (conceptually at least) shouldn't we be looking to the victim's insurance for recompense rather than the dive op?