PfcAJ
Contributor
Ah, but here's the rub. And many of us, including myself are guilty of flipping to the convenient side of this training vs. mentoring coin.
If you don't have the training, how do you know if you're being taught by a good mentor? Just because he hasn't gotten himself killed yet? Because he has cool gear? Because...? Mentors can be a great thing, but they aren't independently evaluated by others, so who is to say if they're great or not?
On the other hand, when you get training from an instructor you do so with a certain degree of confidence that someone has evaluated his teaching methods and found them acceptable. Otherwise he wouldnt be allowed to issue cards, wouldnt be able to get insurance, etc. Still, some do fall through the cracks and run substandard classes. (Which getting back to the original gist of this thread I think we have a responsibility to call those people out as well).
So is there a perfect balance?
I think so. I think the balance is to learn the basics from an instructor. Let them build the foundation of things you need to know, sort of like a paint by number set without the color code. You can see the picture but everything is black and white. Then a mentor helps you fill in the colors to make the picture uniquely yours, but you still know enough to stay inside the lines.
That said, I've seen some instructors teach the most asinine things to students. The level of goobery taught by some of these guys really is beyond the pale.