I have dove an Inspiration several times but I do not own one. It was a wonderful experience and if I ever get to move back to tropical waters I will then own that unit for certain.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
espenskogen:Has any of you guys tried the Ouroborous? (Think that's the spelling)
I have heard a lot of good things about it, and now that it's come down in price a bit, I'm thinking of signing up to get the ticket.
Input anybody?
E
espenskogen:Has any of you guys tried the Ouroborous? (Think that's the spelling)
I have heard a lot of good things about it, and now that it's come down in price a bit, I'm thinking of signing up to get the ticket.
Input anybody?
E
Aqua Marine:Thanks for the help!
Sounds like the Meg, may be a good contender. Any issues with getting parts for them or other quirks?
I would be using it for extending bottom time on deep dives. Open water or wrecks mostly.
Any idea how much bottom time you can get on them and what are the things to look for?
I don't know much about these things other than the basic theory and that I don't have enough time on open circuit beyond 250fsw.
-Gary
wedivebc:The meg factory (hatchery) is located in Centralia Wa so parts are available in your country. The unit, like has been mentioned are tough and well built. They claim the lowest WOB of any RB around but rigdiver's post above really says a lot. I am also inspiration trained but don't own one. I did have a kiss but sold it to buy my meg.
Thanks for the info Andy. So far I will have to take your word for it because I have never dove a prism and my meg is still at the hatchery.silent running:In otherwords, the Meg may have a low WOB, but the Prism will breathe better than a Meg with an axial and a Meg with a radial may a have WOB close to the Prism. But I really doubt it would be better... -Andy
silent running:Hello Dave, while I'm sure the Meg has good WOB, a Meg with an axial scrubber will probably not breathe as well as it would with a radial, like the Prism. If my understanding is correct, the gas path in the meg axial is gas in at top, down the sides of the scrubber housing and in at the bottom of the stack, where it travels up through the stack to the inhale side. This is probably better and less restrictive than the Inspo axial, which has an elbow and pipe at the bottom of the scrubber. Any time your gas has to travel all the way down your back before coming back to the mouth pc, you increase the hydroststic load and the WOB. The Meg with the radial scrubber should breathe better because the gas is flowing through the sides of the scrubber canister, all the way up and down, and thus minimizing the hydrostatic load.
In this configuration, it would be more like the Prism, except I think the Meg radial is an outside to in, which may affect the WOB, due to the pressure differential being slightly higher on the inhale/narrower, center side-not sure about this. But it will affect the dwell time. It will not be as long as inside to out like a Prism radial, due to the increasing cross sectional area, as the gas moves from the center, out.
In otherwords, the Meg may have a low WOB, but the Prism will breathe better than a Meg with an axial and a Meg with a radial may a have WOB close to the Prism. But I really doubt it would be better... -Andy