Thalassamania:
But to say that there was a documentable fatality that resulted from such a clip and to then declare that clip a death trap as a result of that accident, when in point of fact it was neither the proximate nor ultimate cause of Ormsbys death is at best foolish and at worst both disingenuous and intellectualy dishonest, in either case it requires more kool-aid than I can stomach.
Well, I guess I agree with you ... albeit, I'm totally confounded trying to determine what logic process you used to arrive here. It makes me wonder if we're even reading the same thread.
A poster asked if there was "any data of these suicide clips killing anyone diving". The Ormsby incident meets the basic spirit of the question and the posts that followed it. To paraphrase, "Has anyone ever died from entanglement where suicide clips were implicated as a possible contributer ?" Without, hyper-analyzing this, a reasonable person would likely conclude, yes.
Is the Ormsby incident indisputable proof that spring-gated clips are killers? Absolutely not. It's a data point and nothing more. Neither you nor I were there at the time of Ormsby's demise, so neither of us can ever provide conclusive proof either way. We can only speculate, based on the best information that we each have. Anything else would be presumptuous and arrogant.
Frankly I don't need a big science project or lengthy legal proceeding to convince me that: 1.) It's entirely possible and eventually probable that simply brushing against something underwater will open the gate of a gated clip, thus exposing me to added risk of entanglement. 2.) Divers have died from entanglement.
It's a trivial mental exercise to develop the logical sequence that connects these two points. Ultimately, each of us has to process this information and reach our conclusion on how we choose to dive.