lain, in the workshop manual it's said that detregent is bad for the teflon rings, why?
No it does not say that in any of the manuals, but you do bring up a very interesting question.
The short answer.
Is when your cleaning the compressor with a brush and a bucket of soapy water don't flood the piston liners with water and nothing to do with the choice of detergent.
The long answer.
There is another document for this pump called the Design Philosophy Review we did this for both the Royal Navy and the RAF before the UK SA-6 variants were accepted into service. In these documents they go into much more detail and more important a procedure review of how to operate, service, field service, breakdown maintenance etc both in the field (your dive site) and back in the depot or workshop (back home or at the LDS for reference)
Now please keep in mind that your dealing with engineers here, we know what we're doing just not so good in explaining.
But what your referring to in the US manual I posted was with regard to general cleaning of the external compressor parts, the understanding being using a small hand brush mild soap *detergent and water. From memory I think it was *Joy Soap (but NOT Simple Green)
By contrast our engineering review this side ranged up to and included using power jet washers or steam cleaners as per a standard mil procedure. Now on the one hand that would be fine however the risk assessment calls up what would happen if the water jet gets past the rings or with a steam cleaner the heat softening the fan shroud and belt guard in addition to if water gets behind the pistons and into the heads.
The question then was to define just how much water is allowable, a little not a problem a lot and the problem increases to the point of if you could induce hydraulic "Lock" when enough water gets inside and water being incompressible under pressure that it cannot get past the valves and reed lift spaces fast enough and in effect locks the compressor up when you restart it.
In our workshop design review it was concluded that the large tolerance between the piston and the piston liner on each stage was sufficient for the soft PTFE piston ring to safely extrude out (like a bust disc) and release any water at the front end (fan side) but as our risk assessment included nuclear biological chemical NBC considerations together with contaminated water hazards from the cleaning etc etc it gets complicated.
One of our extreme tests was to submerge the compressor block only underwater by hanging on its side by a hook then pull it out attach the power cable and start up with some small additional no tool hand adjustments such as opening the condensate drains and turning the compressor by hand before re starting.
Another test concocted for a Civil Defence project (our version of Homeland Security) was a low temperature -30C start test for NATO.
Now I interpreted this to keep the compressor with an electric motor in an industrial fridge at -30C for 24 hours then drag it outside and start it up. It passed fine.
However by contrast one of our competitors a much loved brand and used by many forum members using an oil lubricated compressor design preferred to interpret the testing requirements differently to ourselves by dragging their compressor out of a warm +21C workshop into a fridge at -30C to simulate starting at -30 C atmospheric ambient as meeting the required test conditions and they also started fine. They were cheaper and won the tender.
Now as these compressors together with the rest of the emergency kits sit in numerous unheated 20 foot containers around a non disclosed NATO EU country I trust that if and when they are needed in anger its in the summer.
Just to illustrate that the devil is sadly for some of us both in the deception and in the detail.