When one raises criticism about the standards and practices of one agency over another, doing so in a rational way often makes the difference between bashing and just criticizing. I have seen (and probably indulged in myself) some pretty emotional outbursts against an agency that, while perhaps being justified as criticism, often make people react defensively and others dismiss the criticism.
Personally I dislike the way the industry (largely as a whole) has watered down instructional standards and content to open SCUBA up to more people, including a number who (IMHO) should not be diving in the first place. Classes decades ago were more comprehensive, longer and demanding than they are now. Today, to achieve the same level of knowledge as conveyed in some of those early classes, you have to combine BOW, AOW and part of Rescue Diver (at the cost of three different certifications).
I don't remember what my OW certification from LA County cost back in the 60's. In today's dollars it may have been much more than what is currently charged. However, it did prepare me to be a real diver.
Where classes are watered down into several certification levels, one has to question the wisdom of such an approach. Is it to allow more people to gain access to SCUBA.. or to generate more revenue for the agency, its shops and instrictors (we all know they don't earn enough under the existing system as it is).
Would be interesting to determine the cost of my OW cert in current dollars and see how that compares to the cost of current OW, AOW and Rescue Diver certification classes. It actually might come fairly close.