Thought I'd update this thread with some new findings.
Could get no consistency on my G250s with new curly style lever or the older small square leg lever. I recently bought some curly feet levers but didn't pay any attention as didn't need them at that point.
Still have a small issue with one of my G250s despite using several different levers. Anyway decided to use one of the new ones, to my surprise it looked like no other lever I had seen before.Turns out it is for a G260. Put it in my G250 and bingo, perfect. Just for experimentations sake put one in another G250 and again perfect.
Have some 98 Satin BAs, one of which was new. Both had the "common" curly feet levers, one has a S-wing poppet with one O ring and a short balance chamber, the other a two O ring S-wing poppet with longer balance chamber. Took apart cleaned, installed new seats, springs and O rings and both cracked at around 1.5-1.6 Could not get them any lower. Super confused as to what was going on.
Took apart, new poppets and G260 lever, same results. Looked at diaphragms, both had the same, and noticed they were taller than my 109/G250 diapghrams. Put in 109/G250 diapghrams and bingo, cracking at around 1. I can only assume they are supposed to crack higher from factory as same reading was recorded regardless of parts, including all original, until diaphragms were changed, strange.
I'll post photos of diaphragms when I get home.
So, result, new G260 levers work perfectky in G250s and 156 BAs. No idea why the taller diaphragms were used given they seem to have a negative effect on performance.
Note: the poppets, particularly on the BAs went in much much easier with the G260 levers. They kept getting hung up using the original curly feet levers, it seemed the legs were catching on the seat as I could see marks on opposite sides of the seat where they'd been hit. Never had that problem with a G250.