Instructor bent after running out of air at 40m

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

For those novice divers reading along with this thread, @doctormike brought up an important concept: rock bottom gas. That's the pressure at which you ABSOLUTELY MUST head up. Let's do the math, to see why this dive just doesn't ring true, especially for well-trained divers. And what likely really happened wasn't just bad judgment, it was absolutely crazy. If you're so inclined, ride along with me as we do the math...

You want to finish with 200psi absolute min, with a 3000# 80cu ft tank. Worst case scenario.

An AL80 has 38.8 psi per cubic foot. (38.8 x 77.4 = 3000). That's right - an 80 only has 77 cu ft.

Let's say your nominal gas consumption is 0.7 cu ft/min. The diver being quoted said that their gas consumption was greater than expected, so let's call it double, or 1.4 cu ft/min.

At their stated 40m/131 feet (5 atm), that becomes 1.4 x 5 = 7 cu ft/min.

You want enough gas to ascend normally from 131 ft.

Ascending at a constant rate of 60fpm from 131’ (5 atm) to 60' (3 atm), and then 30fpm to 15’ (1.5 atm) takes 1.2 min at an average of 4 atm, and 1.5 min at an average of 2.25 atm.

(1.2 min x 4 x 1.4) + (1.5 x 2.25 x 1.4) = 11.4 cu ft. Remember this amount.

Now, safety stop:
3 min x 1.5 atm x 1.4 cu ft/min =
6.3 cu ft. Remember this one, too.

Now fifteen feet of final ascent at 30fpm = 0.5 min x 1.25 atm x 1.4 = 0.9 cu ft.

Add the three together:
11.4 + 6.3 + 0.9 = 18.6 cu ft. Call it 20.

20 cu ft x 38.8 psi per cu ft = 776 psi. Call it 750.

750 psi required ascent gas + 200 psi ending tank pressure =
950 psi rock bottom gas pressure at 131 ft, (not including buddy gas for a shared ascent, which is the true definition of Rock Bottom - so let's think of this as solo rock bottom).

Using 500psi for descent means they have 1500 psi usable gas at 131 ft (5 atm).

1500/ (38.8 x 1.4 x 5) = 1500/272 = SIX minutes to hang around at 131 ft! For a bounce dive to test themselves, this is plenty. And if each overstayed their limit and hit their solo rock-bottom? A nice leisurely ascent. And if ALL FOUR INSTRUCTORS ignored their rock bottom, well, they could skip their safety stop on this supposedly NDL dive.

But they ran out of gas? Two, then four of them? It only requires 350 psi to make a straight 60 fpm ascent from 131'. FOUR (countem', four) INSTRUCTORS didn't notice anything before their SPG read less than 350?
Nah. Something's fishy.

Now what if these divers went to 200 ft?

Add 60 fpm ascent to 131 ft at avg of 5.5 atm:

5.5 x 1.4 x 1.1min x 38.8 = 325 psi

That means their solo rock bottom was 1275 psi.

And using 750 for descent, they'd still have TWO minutes at 200 feet (and if they only stayed 2 minutes, they could avoid doing a deco dive requiring more gas and time on ascent). Nah! Even at double consumption rates, there's still enough gas to bounce to 200 ft. Just tell me that four INSTRUCTORS didn't think they could stay more than 2 minutes at 200 ft on a single 80 cu ft tank each.

What if these divers went to 300 ft?

Add 60 fpm ascent to 200 ft at avg of 7.6 atm:

7.6 x 1.4 x 1.7min x 38.8 = 700 psi
That means their rock bottom at 300’ was 1975 psi.

If they bounce dived to 300’, they had <1 min of gas at that depth before they hit rock bottom (NOT INCLUDING deco gas). But that's irrelevant because after only 10 sec at 300 ft they have already incurred 10 minutes of decompression obligation on the way up. Now we're finally seeing a reason to run out of gas. But at normal consumption rates there would be just enough gas even for the 10 min of deco at crazy liberal settings. Did they maybe think they could do this?!!

You can see why so many posters are calling BS. Only 40 meters? Really?

Something's fishy about this story.
 
Last edited:
Based on the article, it doesn't appear that they were teaching on that dive. I'm just thinking that if I'm the agency that certified them as an instructor, I don't want them reflecting on me; also don't want them doing a crappy job of training new divers and exposing me to a potential lawsuit. A bit of quality control could reduce those risks.
 
Do any agencies have a code of conduct that covers diving outside teaching?
Depends on whether you are slagging off the agency or not. But none of them care about an instructor's crappy diving.
 
Based on the article, it doesn't appear that they were teaching on that dive. I'm just thinking that if I'm the agency that certified them as an instructor, I don't want them reflecting on me; also don't want them doing a crappy job of training new divers and exposing me to a potential lawsuit. A bit of quality control could reduce those risks.
In a perfect world, you might think so. Remember, a dive instructor is not an employee or agent of the agency, they are members and hold a certification issued by the agency. It's a bit like a driving instructor not wearing his seat belt. He probably won't get fired if he gets a seat belt ticket.
 
So, I read the story on the BBC. My first reaction was how could that possibly have happened with four experienced (but young) divers. My second was that they must have been a bit narced. They were at 132 feet. Now, I think of myself as a careful diver, but twice I've lost track of my air photographing nudibranchs (the BBC article says that what they were going to see). Once I went back after I got my camera working and didn't realize how much deeper the nudi was than I had been when I checked my air before going back to the nudi. The other time, I just lost track of time and air photographing. So, I can understand how it could happen.
But with 4 of them, all theoretically monitoring their gas? And...I would imagine you did not run out of gas at depth.
 
In a perfect world, you might think so. Remember, a dive instructor is not an employee or agent of the agency, they are members and hold a certification issued by the agency. It's a bit like a driving instructor not wearing his seat belt. He probably won't get fired if he gets a seat belt ticket.

Probably my scuba idealism coming out. I'd argue a wheelchair is quite a bit more than a seat belt ticket but maybe the agencies still wouldn't care. They should but that can be said about a lot of things.
 
Probably my scuba idealism coming out. I'd argue a wheelchair is quite a bit more than a seat belt ticket but maybe the agencies still wouldn't care. They should but that can be said about a lot of things.
I love that there are still scuba idealists. :)
 
I can't be the only newbie has had 8 dives
I look at my guages way more than I should and the few times it for to 1000 I am letting DM and buddy know it then I just keep looking every few minutes the least I've only ended up with was 600 but I have never been the one to call it luckily I don't go through it that fast
But I had the 1000 beat into me while I got open water certified that I should let them know at 1000
 
I can't be the only newbie has had 8 dives
I look at my guages way more than I should and the few times it for to 1000 I am letting DM and buddy know it then I just keep looking every few minutes the least I've only ended up with was 600 but I have never been the one to call it luckily I don't go through it that fast
But I had the 1000 beat into me while I got open water certified that I should let them know at 1000

It has been said that the average newbie dives pretty safely, checking her gauges often, etc., and the average experienced diver does, too, but it's the group in the middle--people such as young, newly minted dive instructors--who get careless or feel invulnerable.
 
So, if the divers in question dived to 130 feet, they must have had very high RMVs and/or overstayed and went into deco while not monitoring their gas supply.

I wonder what are the statistical risks of getting that badly bent from a faster-than-safe CESA from 30 metres within NDL. One in 100,000?

I know I can swim 30 metres w/o breathing and I strongly suspect I'll have real hard time keeping to safe ascent rate if I had to do that as an emergency OOA ascent.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/swift/

Back
Top Bottom