ajduplessis
Contributor
They are both nice watches, not the best dive computers IMO. The Fenix is a more functional watch than the Suunto.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
They are both nice watches, not the best dive computers IMO. The Fenix is a more functional watch than the Suunto.
The size of the numbers, air integration and a Fischer cable.What does the Descent lack
The size of the numbers, air integration and a Fischer cable.
Shearwater will give you all 3, no need to imagine....
I'm a mechanic. I have veritable "ton" of tools. They probably way two or three tons. Which tool is the "best" depends on the job at hand. I have different BCs, different regs and even different PDCs to select from depending on the dive. Since I've acquired the Petrel with a Fischer cable connector on it, it's made every dive I've made. I almost always dive with a back up, and that has been another Petrel (with CAN interface), a Hollis and now the Descent. I would love to have a Perdix with two sensors for when I side mount.So, the Descent is only "not Best" when compared against an imaginary computer?
I do this with my Hollis, but I dive two PDCs. The left one uses the left transmitter as primary and the right one uses the right transmitter as primary. Very simple indeed.I use mine with two transmitters when diving sidemount.