Aotus
Contributor
I guess I do take offense in that you compare my process of diving with my son to be "similar" to the above mentioned case. There is nothing similar at all.
The cavern my son dives at is called "the crater" and is a spring with deposition of minerals around this underground hot spring. Go there on any day of the year and you will find three-five different instructors teaching open water, it is a rather (comparatively) benign diving hole, and in no way can be compared to eagles nest, which is a cave. If you know anything about that cave, you know it is a place sophisticated, well-trained CAVE divers go to.
Take offfense or not - cavern diving without training is stupid and dangerous.
If what you're saying now is that the site is not actually a cavern that you were talking about (if by "cavern" you meant "diving hole" with no significant overhead), then good! In that case, no harm no foul.
My point in calling out your post was that experience is great, but the importance of training cannot be understated, particularly by the un(-der)trained. If it has been your experience that training is only for card-collecting to get the OK from dive ops, then you might do well to find different instructors. Cavern training is especially important for safe diving in the overhead environment, and unfortunately it is also especially variable in quality. My own experience is a good example - I took cavern twice because it was evident that the first class I took simply did not prepare me for the overhead environment. When I contacted a higher-up from the agency of my first training (PADI), I was told that there are two ways to teach cavern with that agency, 1) for OW divers who want to try it out once or twice in "benign" caverns, and 2) for divers who want to explore further and may want to pursue cave training. Obviously this double standard is problematic, but that is for another discussion as we're already well off-topic.
Last edited: