I found it on a YouTube video.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
This is very strange for me. Luigi Ferraro, Teseo Tesei and De la Penne are considered heroes here.He's referring to Italian frogmen and their operations against Allied shipping in WW2. Axis operations are "mischief" in western culture.
They fought for an evil cause and the wrong side which is why they have a tarnished view. Same goes for the likes of Otto Skorenzy despite his achievements.Hence the initial activities of Italian frogmen were truly acts of heroism, not of mischief...
The Italian frogmen fought for their country. Otto Skorzeny was a first-rate commando, but he was a Nazi and an SS officer.They fought for an evil cause and the wrong side which is why they have a tarnished view. Same goes for the likes of Otto Skorenzy despite his achievements.
I'm of Italian descent and my father in law is a naturalized citizen hailing from Genoa. I'm just giving you the feelings that Americans and British have towards axis combatants.
<snip>
To be clear, at the time of posting this I do not have even 50 dives in my logs, and am not Nitrox certified. And even still, even still, with my limited experience, when I saw a photo of what I now know to be a member of the Italian Fire Brigade entering the water with a single 15L air tank, my first thoughts were "Why aren't they using nitrox for that depth? Surely they must be using nitrox. Maybe they label the tanks differently in Italy?" Such a fool am I...
<snip>
Absolutely. And I've learned a lot more about enriched air since (still not certified though). That post was more about my instinctive gut reaction to armchair quarterback when I really had no idea of the situation than anything else...Nitrox is generally used in shallower water. They could dive EAN23, I suppose, to stay at or under the generally accepted max of 1.4 ATA O2 partial pressure at 165', but the benefits are negligible vs. plain old air, and operationally things are more complex. The gas has to be mixed, analyzed, tanks marked, etc. Much deeper, and you have to use less O2, not more, to improve your chances of avoiding O2 toxicity.
165' is about as deep as I want to go without Trimix, though. Any deeper than 165' and I get even stupider than I am on the surface...and at 165' I rather suspect some or even most people have some significant impairment from narcosis on air. (I am sure we will now hear from everyone who thinks they aren't even slightly impaired at 165'.)