BO, I think thats true of everyone! The point is People own these shops! Your wacko if you have a relationship with an inanimate object! and therefore explains #2!:no What part of Far exchange don't you get?
If by "fair exchange" you mean that I am interested in the shop owner making a decent living, you're mistaken. I want the best value I can get, and whether that is a good or bad deal for the shop owner is irrelevant to me. I feed my family, he can feed his.
The problem is, many (if not most) LDS's have an inefficient business model, wherein they can't afford to compete with internet brokers. It's not that the owners are bad people, or that they are out to gouge their customers. It's just that the volume and low overhead of internet delivery is superior to an LDS. With a few narrow exceptions, I don't see why people continue to pay extra at their LDS, but it appearently is out of some sense of loyalty to that business or person.
My sense of loyalty doesn't take me that far. I won't give away extra money to be nice to a nice guy just because he is friendly with me.
I will pay extra to professionals I trust to help me make selections, configure gear, etc. That service is still needed, and it's something that should demand pay. But the service should be separated out from inefficient business model. That's why I like the idea of instructors teaching outside of the shops. I don't want to be lassoed into the product distribution activities. I want to pay for services.
So to sum it all up, I'm not all that loyal to anyone. I pay for services that I think are the best I can get for the price I am willing to pay, and if someone else comes along and can do it better for cheaper, I'll generally go that direction. Because the only people that I'll give my money to purely out of loyalty is my family, not the guys down at the LDS.