Hello Bob,
Thank you for your reply. I did not know that you and co. developed the first heel support fin; I applaud you for that. Of course this brings up another set of questions©¢fter trying a heel supported fin, why make (if one is the manufacturer) or choose (if one is the consumer) a fin that does not have this feature?
Question deux: I know R&D can be rather expensive, but why such a price difference in FF and say Jet Fins? Is this a function of supply and demand? Is the manufacturing process that much more expensive or is there some other reason that escapes me?
Thank you,
Couv
I am sure Bob is going to jump in and further answer your question, but I will try to answer some of it for you and save him some time.
for part 1, I don't know, the only thing I can think of, is that well people have their opinions and they are entitled to them, they can buy whatever they want and the market is more than happy to give it to them, thus us the law of supply and demand, it has nothing to do with quality, function, etc... its purely what people want.
for part 2, as a consumer I don't see the cost of ForceFins being high at all. ForceFin Originals sell right now for $150-$180 and the Pros a little higher. Right in line with most of the competition. The price difference with Jets, is simple, the patent on Jets expired in the 60's are made from <$5 of rubber and cost <$30 to deliver to the store shelves so can be sold for <$70.
For production and R&D, to acheive the desired characteristics, Bob selected materials that cost more and take longer to produce. This material requires that the fins are hand cast and then set in a curing oven for something like 16 hours, with a 1 degree of temp tolerance to properly allow the material to crosslink and bond. obviously, time is money, and these fins take a lot of time.