Pavao
Contributor
- Messages
- 756
- Reaction score
- 436
My point has been that it is just not logistically practical to adopt a check out dive culture in many locations. You have quoted me upthread where I gave a real life example of that.Why a professional experienced LOB would do this is beyond me. The first dive of any multiday trip with unvetted passengers should probably not be to 100ft with a midwater ascent. What's wrong with a 40ft bimble in low current OW checkout dive conditions with a staff person/DM tagging along?
On top of not being able to do a check out dive, there’s also the issue of its efficiency and validity, the incident example you posted is a clear case of that.
We are 100% in agreement here, looks like we just disagree in the solution.Sure its the current reality - which is just as flawed as the rest of the scuba industry. Doesn't have to be that way though.
I’m not assuming, I’ve been told that’s what it in this very thread…Why are you assuming a checkout dive is a 30 second mask clearing or whatever?
a checkout which would only need two minutes to see the diver in action. Even in a shallow pool.
And in the first 30 seconds of a dive a good guide or instructor knows if a person can dive or not.
divers were taken down one or two at a time to demonstrate mask clearing and a couple of other fundamental skills.
Let’s kick this up a notch, I’m not sure how your guys world is, but around these parts, tech dives are done with first time costumers often, your guys heads are exploding about a diver doing a guided recreational 100’ dive as a first time costumers.The "checkout" actually starts on the surface observing how guests get ready and continues underwater.
Look, I’ve said it upthread, in principle, I’d love the vetting process idea, almost more than anyone in this thread, given I work as a guide and the last thing I want is be involved in an accident when I’m working, it’s just not efficient, or realistic.
I’d rather concentrate my efforts on training quality.