eelnoraa
Contributor
I have to respectfully disagree here, the seat saver is one of the most important features that make the Atomic regulators as reliable as they are compared with the rest of the regulators out there in the market today. I run 3 - 5 years between servicing my Atomic regulators, all models, without ANY issues. This is very different for other brands including SP. For the other brands, you need to service them and replace the ss seat every 3 years if not before. The seat saver features and the materials Atomic uses in their regulators make their regulators the most reliable regulators I have ever used and serviced while having the highest performance they do.
I also agree here. Seat saving is what makes service interval longer (not necessary more dives). When reg is not pressurized, the 1st stage seat is not in contact with the piston edge. This is true for any piston reg. But 2nd stage is different. Without some kind of seat saver features, seat are in contact with the orifice with full force of the spring. And usually 2nd stage starts to act up because orifice/seat don't fully seal. With seat saver feature, 2nd stage seat is relief from pressure when not in used. The disadvantage is when cleaning, a bit more attention is needed. Persoanlly, I havent found this to be an issue.
But I want to say, seat saver isn't unique to atomics. I used to have a 2nd stage, when not in use, I can lock the purge button in to release pressure from the 2nd stage seat.