Easier to maintain? Not much easier than "Don't dunk the second stage unpressurized".
"Dunk it, in any state" IS just a little easier.
I can see how this can be an issue for the more casual diver, who does not have tanks at home. If you're out on a boat that doesn't have a fresh water gear rinse tank (which most don't, that I've been on), then you're waiting until you're back on land to rinse. Sometimes, arrival back at the dock doesn't really afford the time or there is not a tank handy to let you pressurize the reg and rinse it. And even if you could, that rinse isn't necessarily as thorough as what you might want to do when you get home.
If you wait until you get home to really rinse or soak your regs, and you don't have a scuba tank of your own, the difference between a reg with the Seat Saver and one without becomes significant.
Lastly, the T series are the only ones with a 3 year maintenance interval. All the other Atomics are 2 years. They all have the Seat Saver. I think the Seat Saver is not what makes the interval longer. I think it's the titanium that gives the T series its extra year between services.
ScubaPro is now 2 years. I think other major manufacturers are also going to 2 years. To me, the Seat Saver is not something that seems to give a practical advantage and I would be perfectly happy to not have the feature and not have to take the extra step to put my regs on a tank before soaking them at home. I don't notice any wear on my ScubaPro 2nd stage seats...
But, I think the Atomic Z2 regs are one of the best values for money in the regulator marketplace, and the M1 regs are a really nice tech reg - and also pretty good value for money. So, I have a Z2 set and am buying some M1s in spite of the Seat Saver - not because of it.