Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Screen grab from a GoPro video of one of my recent cave dives in North Florida. Predator on top, H3 on bottom.
Screen grab from a GoPro video of one of my recent cave dives in North Florida. Predator on top, H3 on bottom.
They are both OLED screens. I have the brightness turned down on the Predator. I did not adjust the brightness on the H3. The difference in sharpness you're seeing is due to glare and angle of shot.And their respective brightness settings? The SB is brighter in your photo, but its display is also less clear despite having larger characters. Hard to tell if it's actually an inferior screen or just glare on the camera, though.
More data is available at the push of a buttonPlus the shearwater is displaying a lot more datapoints. Still, I would not mind testing one, buying different story.
It was a birthday gift, so I'm not out any money :blinking:. I like everything about this computer. Easy to set up and easy to use while diving. I've even worn it as a watch a few times. Also, Subgravity is quick to answer any questions I have. Did anybody notice the difference in depth readings? Subgravity is supposed to be releasing an update with what they call a "science unlock" so you can adjust for salt or fresh water. I have the Predator set for fresh. Granted it's an expensive computer, but IMHO, it's worth it.What do you think of the H3 so far ?
Did anyone notice the HUGE difference in NDL on the computers? For the same dive the SeaBear was giving 147 mins, and the Shearwater was giving 94 mins. What accouints for this, when they both run Buhlman Z 16?
You're assuming the Predator's not set to VPM, but even if they're both running Buhlman the high gradient factor on the Predator may be set lower than whatever the surfacing limitation is on the H3.