It's great to read the various experiences.
We probably won't go there for a variety of reasons, but one thing I have always debated in my mind is the pros and cons of tourism in such a place. There's pros and cons of tourism everywhere of course, but in PW I can see the validity of the argument that if such a place is boycotted, it may be a motivation towards change, or at least one may decide that he or she just doesn't want to be around such a culture.
OTOH, it may be a motivation for change if Western tourists are present to bring income to the area, present ourselves as reasonable people, and not least to report out how things are.
Again, I really value that people are reporting their facts and experiences.
- Bill
Pulau Weh, or Aceh, doesn't need to change. It's a beautiful part of the world and they have a good culture and great people already. If you don't fancy going there, then don't don't go. But to suggest 'boycotting' an area to force change is ridiculous. The best way to 'present yourself as a reasonable person' is to go and to respect their culture - not to go with the idea that western culture is better and they should change.