- Messages
- 3,464
- Reaction score
- 27
I feel that artifact recovery is proper provided several requirements are met.
First, the recovered artifacts must be properly conserved and displayed, preferably publically but at least displayed to one's houseguests. I do not feel that artifacts should ever be recovered and just put away in a box somewhere (this goes for museums as well as private collectors).
Second, the wreck must have no protected status. This would, of course, not count if one has a permit for the recovery.
Wreck identification is a proper reason for artifact recovery. Prevention of loss is another (such as a rapidly deteriorating wreck).
I also support commercial salvage. I feel that when one recovers large quantities of valuable artifacts of which examples exist on public view, such as coinage or precious bar stock, the individual(s) who put in the time and expense to recover these items are perfectly within their rights to sell the items.
Tom
First, the recovered artifacts must be properly conserved and displayed, preferably publically but at least displayed to one's houseguests. I do not feel that artifacts should ever be recovered and just put away in a box somewhere (this goes for museums as well as private collectors).
Second, the wreck must have no protected status. This would, of course, not count if one has a permit for the recovery.
Wreck identification is a proper reason for artifact recovery. Prevention of loss is another (such as a rapidly deteriorating wreck).
I also support commercial salvage. I feel that when one recovers large quantities of valuable artifacts of which examples exist on public view, such as coinage or precious bar stock, the individual(s) who put in the time and expense to recover these items are perfectly within their rights to sell the items.
Tom