I’d like to point out that diving with composite cylinders can be a tricky business.
The main issue, as mentioned earlier, is corrosion. To be more specific, galvanic corrosion. Carbon fibres sit very high on the galvanic series, not quite as high as graphite, but still significantly higher than aluminium. It has a standard electrode potential of 0.55V, comparable to copper (Even slightly higher). Aluminium, on the other hand, sits much lower in the series, with a standard electrode potential of -1.67V, making for a terrible coupling. In this setup, carbon fibre acts as the cathode, while the aluminium liner becomes the anode, corroding rapidly if an electrolyte, such as water, connects the two. Even the cylinder valve can be effected, if the epoxy layer is not sound.
For this reason, composite cylinders require a buffer layer between the carbon fibres and the aluminium liner. This is often a glass filament epoxy layer, similar to what you see on the outermost surface. Current standards limit these buffer layers to a maximum of around 15% of the pressure load at minimum burst pressure.
Because of these risks, most manufacturers explicitly prohibit the use of their composite cylinders for diving. The only manufacturer that comes to mind with a purpose-built composite cylinder for diving is Luxfer.
That doesn’t mean they can’t be used for diving, as @rjack321 demonstrates well. But it does mean, that special care and thorough inspection are absolutely essential throughout the cylinders use.
The pictures you’ve shared are interesting because I don’t see an insulating epoxy layer between the carbon fibres. That said, pictures can be notoriously difficult to interpret when taken out of context.
How can we see an epoxy layer beneath the carbon layer and the aluminum? It's usually visible?