@Tracy has anyone tried to get a plus on a lp72 with the figures from
@Luis H ?
@Whitrzac have you called the hydro facility to ask if they did the prestretch correctly? most places will rerun a fail and if it fails twice in a row, it pretty much is definitive
I doubt it. His numbers are correct. So is the number on the old PST paperwork floating around with the misprint on the working pressure.
The issue isn't if the tank will pass. I have never seen a 72 that wouldn't qualify for it and I have owned and sold several hundred of them.
The issue is, if you don't have an old book on hand to look up that REE, you can't stamp it. You can't call the manufacturer and get an e-mail stating what it is, you can't have them verify that the paperwork has a misprint in the working pressure column, they are all long out of business. As with everything in this country, it comes down to CYA.
If that tank were to ever have an issue that resulted in a lawsuit, (this is America, if there is an accident, there will be a lawsuit.) and it came back that the hydro was done incorrectly, you have opened yourself up to liability with zero gain from it.
How do you think it will sound in court,
"You marked "Other" as REE source in the hydro paperwork. Where was this information obtained?"
"A guy on Scubaboard name Luis said it was good."
Yeah, I see that working out great.
It isn't worth potential liability and the risk of getting their RIN revoked so that you can feel good about putting an extra 200 psi in a 50 year old tank.