Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
You are correct, I forgot they changed their service pressure to match the fill pressure.Not exactly. TC doesn't have pluses in their stamped pressures nowadays. Dual rated DOT and TC tanks will have psi and a + as well as a metric service pressure with no plus. They are the same pressure though.
I see Faber 85s and 95s up there fairly often. And 72s even - but no pluses, and not even TC ratings on those. They are getting Canadian hydros somehow, although it's beyond my understanding of TC regs how that works.I will have to look at my TC marked tanks, LPs aren't as common up north.
I have a copy of the PST document that even with the error I have successfully used for my LP72. Of corse it passed but failed "+".For the record, it's basically impossible to get a plus on a lp72, any of the faber MP 3000psi+ rated tanks (mostly MP72s which look like HP80s), or any of the PST LP series tanks here either - since the REE is almost always missing from those tanks/eras.
For the record, it's basically impossible to get a plus on a lp72, any of the faber MP 3000psi+ rated tanks (mostly MP72s which look like HP80s), or any of the PST LP series tanks here either - since the REE is almost always missing from those tanks/eras.
I have a copy of the PST document that even with the error I have successfully used for my LP72. Of corse it passed but failed "+".
As for Faber cylinders with the REE. I have sent Faber via Blue Steel requesting the REE for my LP76 cylinders. They gave those to based on the serial numbers. Those cylinders have the "+".
Yeah that doesn't fly around here at all. Nor emails "from Faber"I have a copy of the PST document that even with the error I have successfully used for my LP72. Of corse it passed but failed "+".