tangfish
Contributor
I've been diving some E7 80s, doubled. I'm changing to LP85s soon, for trim reasons. I love the short 80s for singles, but they make too much of a cube-like shape for doubles in my newbie opinion.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
limeyx:one good thing for cold water can be that the X7 is for the same size tank usually more negative empty, so you can use a bit less weight.
However the X7-120 is so darned long that when I rented one, it was hanging down to my knees (well it felt like that)
and agreed on the 130 vs 119 -- maybe 1.5 pounds in it.
I just got a set of double 130's but haven't dived them yet ...
LG Diver:Thanks Perrone and Lamont. Sounds like the X8 130 is the way to go. Just out of curiosity, what's "wrong" with the 7.25" diameter? Is it just that it's not as common or widely accepted in the tech community as the 8", or is there something technically inferior with it?
Whitelightnin:I have been trying to find out which ones I like better also. Been working on it for the past year & a half. One good thing about owning a dive shop is that I can sell the tanks I don't like & still come out OK. After diving just about everything out there, I decided on the 130's. Hardly any difference in weight among the larger tanks. VERY simular with the LP 108's. If I don't want to carry that much gas, I can just fill to a lower pressure (not sure why I would not want to carry as much gas as possible but, I have that option). The longer tanks trim out better for me. With the shorter tanks, my diving is mostly nose diving.
James
Ben_ca:X7-100's ... will be great for singles and also when you want to go doubles they will also work
The 120's are huge.... and also if you really want some there's someone in the east bay selling 2 pst 120's for 150 each