What, you mean a site created with express purpose of finding out who censored whom at the prom is not the shining beacon of ethics and morals? Whodathunk!
... universities have prom? I don't remember that part... which is probably for the best.
But origins of FB aside, their community standards DO say that:
"
Fraud and Spam: How we protect you from fraud and spam.
We work hard to help ensure that the information you share is secure. We investigate any suspected breach of security. Any attempt to compromise the security of a Profile, including fraud, may be referred to law enforcement. Using misleading or inaccurate information to artificially collect likes, followers, or shares is not allowed. We also ask that you respect people by not contacting them for commercial purposes without their consent."
Ooh, and even better:
"
Criminal Activity: How we handle reports of criminal activity on Facebook.
We prohibit the use of Facebook to facilitate or organize criminal activity that causes physical harm to people, businesses or animals, or financial damage to people or businesses. We work with law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or direct threats to public safety.
We also prohibit you from celebrating any crimes you’ve committed. We do, however, allow people to debate or advocate for the legality of criminal activities, as well as address them in a humorous or satirical way. "
So, really, the bit that I find interesting is that they are effectively just turning a blind eye to what is *ahem* allegedly fraudulent activity happening through their website. After all, using misleading or inaccurate information to collect
money IS apparently entirely acceptable and it's somehow not a criminal activity to defraud people? Either that, or nearly $1M isn't considered financially damaging.
Not that I care, really, I just find it interesting.