Hi all,
Now I have been bitten by the tec bug, it is amazing that you take a lot more interest now in regs (reg envy?). It appears that the Mk 25 seems to be the standard operating equipment for a twin setup, predomanently from the view that it seems easier to route the hoses with the LP outlet at the end of its body.
So I ask the question, has anyone emulated the success and design of the Mk25. To date I have been leaning towads the Oceanic and Hollis for my rec setups. I use an FDX 10 / EOS and a Hollis 212/DC1 normally. But neither of these have the finesse of the Mk25 for the twin setup. When something shines, other companies usually copy... why not with the MK25?
Cheers
Rainsey
Now I have been bitten by the tec bug, it is amazing that you take a lot more interest now in regs (reg envy?). It appears that the Mk 25 seems to be the standard operating equipment for a twin setup, predomanently from the view that it seems easier to route the hoses with the LP outlet at the end of its body.
So I ask the question, has anyone emulated the success and design of the Mk25. To date I have been leaning towads the Oceanic and Hollis for my rec setups. I use an FDX 10 / EOS and a Hollis 212/DC1 normally. But neither of these have the finesse of the Mk25 for the twin setup. When something shines, other companies usually copy... why not with the MK25?
Cheers
Rainsey