Is this evidence emphirical of today's male? As I mentioned in an earlier post I think that in the past it was a chemical dependency to achieve the goals of the hunt. By today's standards where hunting is not necessary, I wonder if the drive to hunt and kill can be reduced just to a single biological need.catherine96821:Okay, I googled testosterone and hunting. Let's just say there is compelling scientific evidence. If that is not politically acceptable, I cannot dialog anymore because the boundaries are just too artificial. This sort of thing is Time magazine cover story material, you guys. Mainstream science in my opinion.